圭多·Cavalcanti

David Bowe
{"title":"圭多·Cavalcanti","authors":"David Bowe","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849575.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 introduces Guido Cavalcanti’s radically internalized model of poetic subjectivity as a point of contrast with the other poets in this study. The chapter demonstrates Cavalcanti’s resistance towards any sort of unitary poetics or accounts of self and his ambivalence towards religious authority as a source of literary validation. Cavalcanti’s divergence from his predecessors is demonstrated through analysis of his own poetry in dialogue with the works of Guittone, Guinizzelli, and Dante. The chapter explores Cavalcanti’s alternative model of subjectivity and love poetry, in which his texts perform an irreducibly polyphonic subjectivity through multiple personifications, justified by natural philosophy. This analysis foregrounds the importance of an intra-discursive dialogism, in which poetry and subjectivity are generated through tensions and internalized dialogues.","PeriodicalId":319616,"journal":{"name":"Poetry in Dialogue in the Duecento and Dante","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guido Cavalcanti\",\"authors\":\"David Bowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198849575.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 3 introduces Guido Cavalcanti’s radically internalized model of poetic subjectivity as a point of contrast with the other poets in this study. The chapter demonstrates Cavalcanti’s resistance towards any sort of unitary poetics or accounts of self and his ambivalence towards religious authority as a source of literary validation. Cavalcanti’s divergence from his predecessors is demonstrated through analysis of his own poetry in dialogue with the works of Guittone, Guinizzelli, and Dante. The chapter explores Cavalcanti’s alternative model of subjectivity and love poetry, in which his texts perform an irreducibly polyphonic subjectivity through multiple personifications, justified by natural philosophy. This analysis foregrounds the importance of an intra-discursive dialogism, in which poetry and subjectivity are generated through tensions and internalized dialogues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poetry in Dialogue in the Duecento and Dante\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poetry in Dialogue in the Duecento and Dante\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849575.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetry in Dialogue in the Duecento and Dante","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849575.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第三章介绍了卡瓦尔康蒂激进内化的诗歌主体性模式,作为与本研究中其他诗人的对比。这一章展示了卡瓦尔康蒂对任何形式的单一诗学或自我描述的抵制,以及他对宗教权威作为文学验证来源的矛盾心理。卡瓦尔康蒂与他的前辈的分歧是通过分析他自己的诗歌与吉特通,圭尼泽利和但丁的作品的对话来证明的。本章探讨了卡瓦尔康蒂的主体性和爱情诗歌的另一种模式,在这种模式中,他的文本通过多种人格化来表现一种不可简化的复调主体性,并被自然哲学所证明。这种分析强调了话语内部对话的重要性,在这种对话中,诗歌和主体性是通过紧张和内化的对话产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guido Cavalcanti
Chapter 3 introduces Guido Cavalcanti’s radically internalized model of poetic subjectivity as a point of contrast with the other poets in this study. The chapter demonstrates Cavalcanti’s resistance towards any sort of unitary poetics or accounts of self and his ambivalence towards religious authority as a source of literary validation. Cavalcanti’s divergence from his predecessors is demonstrated through analysis of his own poetry in dialogue with the works of Guittone, Guinizzelli, and Dante. The chapter explores Cavalcanti’s alternative model of subjectivity and love poetry, in which his texts perform an irreducibly polyphonic subjectivity through multiple personifications, justified by natural philosophy. This analysis foregrounds the importance of an intra-discursive dialogism, in which poetry and subjectivity are generated through tensions and internalized dialogues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信