土耳其的恐怖袭击:对2016年发生的恐怖主义行为的评估

D. Y. Mohammed, M. Karabatak
{"title":"土耳其的恐怖袭击:对2016年发生的恐怖主义行为的评估","authors":"D. Y. Mohammed, M. Karabatak","doi":"10.1109/ISDFS.2018.8355370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Terrorist attacks are the most significant challenging for the humankind across the world, which need the whole attention. To predict the terrorist group which is accountable for results and activities utilizing historical info is a difficult task because of the lake of detailed terrorist data. Therefore, this paper based on predicting terrorist groups responsible of attacks in TURKEY terrorist acts that occurred in 2016 by using data mining techniques is analyzing the most useful and accessible algorithms used by the machine learning systems. The typical analysis of these datasets including algorithms is implemented on the Weka tool depends upon real info represented through Global Terrorism Database (GTD) from the national consortium for the study of terrorism and responses of terrorism (START). The results of the paper show which algorithm is more convenient for a particular dataset. Tests are performed on real-life data by using Weka and also the final analysis and conclusion based on five performance steps which revealed that J48, is more accurate than Bayes Net, SVM and NB but KNN has the lowest classification accuracy although it performs well in other measures.","PeriodicalId":154279,"journal":{"name":"2018 6th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS)","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terrorist attacks in Turkey: An evaluate of terrorist acts that occurred in 2016\",\"authors\":\"D. Y. Mohammed, M. Karabatak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISDFS.2018.8355370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Terrorist attacks are the most significant challenging for the humankind across the world, which need the whole attention. To predict the terrorist group which is accountable for results and activities utilizing historical info is a difficult task because of the lake of detailed terrorist data. Therefore, this paper based on predicting terrorist groups responsible of attacks in TURKEY terrorist acts that occurred in 2016 by using data mining techniques is analyzing the most useful and accessible algorithms used by the machine learning systems. The typical analysis of these datasets including algorithms is implemented on the Weka tool depends upon real info represented through Global Terrorism Database (GTD) from the national consortium for the study of terrorism and responses of terrorism (START). The results of the paper show which algorithm is more convenient for a particular dataset. Tests are performed on real-life data by using Weka and also the final analysis and conclusion based on five performance steps which revealed that J48, is more accurate than Bayes Net, SVM and NB but KNN has the lowest classification accuracy although it performs well in other measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 6th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS)\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 6th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDFS.2018.8355370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 6th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDFS.2018.8355370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

恐怖袭击是人类面临的最重大挑战,需要引起全世界的高度重视。由于缺乏详细的恐怖主义数据,利用历史信息预测对结果和活动负责的恐怖组织是一项艰巨的任务。因此,本文基于使用数据挖掘技术预测2016年土耳其恐怖袭击事件的恐怖组织,分析了机器学习系统使用的最有用和可访问的算法。对这些数据集(包括算法)的典型分析是在Weka工具上实现的,这些分析依赖于来自国家恐怖主义研究和恐怖主义反应联盟(START)的全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD)所表示的真实信息。本文的研究结果表明,对于特定的数据集,哪种算法更方便。使用Weka对实际数据进行了测试,并根据五个性能步骤进行了最终分析和结论,结果表明J48比Bayes Net, SVM和NB更准确,但KNN的分类精度最低,尽管它在其他措施中表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Terrorist attacks in Turkey: An evaluate of terrorist acts that occurred in 2016
Terrorist attacks are the most significant challenging for the humankind across the world, which need the whole attention. To predict the terrorist group which is accountable for results and activities utilizing historical info is a difficult task because of the lake of detailed terrorist data. Therefore, this paper based on predicting terrorist groups responsible of attacks in TURKEY terrorist acts that occurred in 2016 by using data mining techniques is analyzing the most useful and accessible algorithms used by the machine learning systems. The typical analysis of these datasets including algorithms is implemented on the Weka tool depends upon real info represented through Global Terrorism Database (GTD) from the national consortium for the study of terrorism and responses of terrorism (START). The results of the paper show which algorithm is more convenient for a particular dataset. Tests are performed on real-life data by using Weka and also the final analysis and conclusion based on five performance steps which revealed that J48, is more accurate than Bayes Net, SVM and NB but KNN has the lowest classification accuracy although it performs well in other measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信