{"title":"原发性开角型青光眼(poag)微创分流器植入术与深度巩膜切开术的比较","authors":"Khallaf, H., A. M., El-moddather, M., G. A.","doi":"10.21608/ejco.2021.215520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: is to compare the success rate of Ex-PRESS implantation vs deep sclerotomy (DS) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients and methods: This is a randomized prospective interventional comparative study between Ex-PRESS and DS maneuvers in patients with POAG. The study included 47patients (50 eyes) with POAG. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 25 patients (25 eyes) who underwent Ex-PRESS device implantation. Group 2 included 22 patients (25 eyes) who underwent DS. All included patients underwent a thorough ophthalmic examination. At the end of the 1 st year postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [logMAR], intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications in use were obtained. Results: In group 1, complete success rate was 76%, qualified success rate was 20% and failure rate 4% occurred in 1 eye of patients which needed explantation of the device and another glaucoma filtering surgery due to device-corneal touch. Meanwhile in group 2, complete success rate was36% and qualified success rate was 64% without any recorded failure in this group (Both Ps<0.01) in both groups. Conclusion: favorable effects on IOP and the need for IOPlowering medications in both Ex-PRESS and DS groups. However, in DS group, higher preoperative IOP is associated with increased failure rate necessitating more postoperative IOP adjustments than Ex-PRESS group.","PeriodicalId":267572,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","volume":"45 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON BETWEEN EX-PRESS MINI SHUNT IMPLANTATION AND DEEP SCLEROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA (POAG)\",\"authors\":\"Khallaf, H., A. M., El-moddather, M., G. A.\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejco.2021.215520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: is to compare the success rate of Ex-PRESS implantation vs deep sclerotomy (DS) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients and methods: This is a randomized prospective interventional comparative study between Ex-PRESS and DS maneuvers in patients with POAG. The study included 47patients (50 eyes) with POAG. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 25 patients (25 eyes) who underwent Ex-PRESS device implantation. Group 2 included 22 patients (25 eyes) who underwent DS. All included patients underwent a thorough ophthalmic examination. At the end of the 1 st year postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [logMAR], intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications in use were obtained. Results: In group 1, complete success rate was 76%, qualified success rate was 20% and failure rate 4% occurred in 1 eye of patients which needed explantation of the device and another glaucoma filtering surgery due to device-corneal touch. Meanwhile in group 2, complete success rate was36% and qualified success rate was 64% without any recorded failure in this group (Both Ps<0.01) in both groups. Conclusion: favorable effects on IOP and the need for IOPlowering medications in both Ex-PRESS and DS groups. However, in DS group, higher preoperative IOP is associated with increased failure rate necessitating more postoperative IOP adjustments than Ex-PRESS group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"45 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejco.2021.215520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejco.2021.215520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
COMPARISON BETWEEN EX-PRESS MINI SHUNT IMPLANTATION AND DEEP SCLEROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA (POAG)
Purpose: is to compare the success rate of Ex-PRESS implantation vs deep sclerotomy (DS) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients and methods: This is a randomized prospective interventional comparative study between Ex-PRESS and DS maneuvers in patients with POAG. The study included 47patients (50 eyes) with POAG. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 25 patients (25 eyes) who underwent Ex-PRESS device implantation. Group 2 included 22 patients (25 eyes) who underwent DS. All included patients underwent a thorough ophthalmic examination. At the end of the 1 st year postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [logMAR], intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications in use were obtained. Results: In group 1, complete success rate was 76%, qualified success rate was 20% and failure rate 4% occurred in 1 eye of patients which needed explantation of the device and another glaucoma filtering surgery due to device-corneal touch. Meanwhile in group 2, complete success rate was36% and qualified success rate was 64% without any recorded failure in this group (Both Ps<0.01) in both groups. Conclusion: favorable effects on IOP and the need for IOPlowering medications in both Ex-PRESS and DS groups. However, in DS group, higher preoperative IOP is associated with increased failure rate necessitating more postoperative IOP adjustments than Ex-PRESS group.