高年级医学生支气管哮喘领域的评估。研究ASSA的最终结果(2014-2016)

R. Bontsevich, K. Vlasova, G. Ketova, V. Barysheva, E. Luchinina, M. Malkina, N. Goncharova, Yu. V. Feoktistova
{"title":"高年级医学生支气管哮喘领域的评估。研究ASSA的最终结果(2014-2016)","authors":"R. Bontsevich, K. Vlasova, G. Ketova, V. Barysheva, E. Luchinina, M. Malkina, N. Goncharova, Yu. V. Feoktistova","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of study is to estimate the knowledge of medical students at the senior courses of higher schools in the key aspect of bronchial asthma (BA).\n\nMaterials and methods . The multicentre study was conducted in the Russian Federation in 6 cities (Belgorod, Chelyabinsk, Saratov, Samara, Voronezh & Vladivostok), 139 of higher grade (4th-6th grade) medical students were tested. Knowledge of key aspects of bronchial asthma such as definition, pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment was evaluated through the means of a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions. These questions were a mix of multi choice and anecdotal.\n\nResults . The average level of correct answers totaled 72.4% and varied from 58.6% to 88.2% in different centers. The most difficult questions were the following: BA definition (43.2% of correct answers), key factor of BA pathogenesis (63.3%), peak flowmetry as the main method of BA self-control (61.9%), fixed combinations of drugs (62.6%).\n\nThe best results were shown when defining the following: trigger in the development of an asthmatic attack (89.2%), the main method of BA diagnosis (89.2%), variants of BA severity (87.1%), status asthmaticus (94.2%).\n\nConclusion . Despite the availability of plenty training and scientific literature in bronchial asthma field the level of knowledge in this area cannot be admitted as satisfactory. The level of incorrect answers to basic questions reaches 41.4% in the certain centers. Thus bronchial asthma subject should be studied more thoroughly in the medical higher schools.","PeriodicalId":228043,"journal":{"name":"Medical education, web and internet","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of senior medical students in the field of bronchial asthma. Final results of the study ASSA (2014-2016)\",\"authors\":\"R. Bontsevich, K. Vlasova, G. Ketova, V. Barysheva, E. Luchinina, M. Malkina, N. Goncharova, Yu. V. Feoktistova\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of study is to estimate the knowledge of medical students at the senior courses of higher schools in the key aspect of bronchial asthma (BA).\\n\\nMaterials and methods . The multicentre study was conducted in the Russian Federation in 6 cities (Belgorod, Chelyabinsk, Saratov, Samara, Voronezh & Vladivostok), 139 of higher grade (4th-6th grade) medical students were tested. Knowledge of key aspects of bronchial asthma such as definition, pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment was evaluated through the means of a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions. These questions were a mix of multi choice and anecdotal.\\n\\nResults . The average level of correct answers totaled 72.4% and varied from 58.6% to 88.2% in different centers. The most difficult questions were the following: BA definition (43.2% of correct answers), key factor of BA pathogenesis (63.3%), peak flowmetry as the main method of BA self-control (61.9%), fixed combinations of drugs (62.6%).\\n\\nThe best results were shown when defining the following: trigger in the development of an asthmatic attack (89.2%), the main method of BA diagnosis (89.2%), variants of BA severity (87.1%), status asthmaticus (94.2%).\\n\\nConclusion . Despite the availability of plenty training and scientific literature in bronchial asthma field the level of knowledge in this area cannot be admitted as satisfactory. The level of incorrect answers to basic questions reaches 41.4% in the certain centers. Thus bronchial asthma subject should be studied more thoroughly in the medical higher schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical education, web and internet\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical education, web and internet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical education, web and internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究旨在了解高等学校高年级医学生对支气管哮喘(BA)关键知识的了解情况。材料和方法。这项多中心研究是在俄罗斯联邦6个城市(别尔哥罗德、车里雅宾斯克、萨拉托夫、萨马拉、沃罗涅日和符拉迪沃斯托克)进行的,对139名高年级(4 -6年级)医科学生进行了测试。通过一份包含12个问题的问卷,对支气管哮喘的定义、发病机制、诊断和治疗等关键方面的知识进行评估。这些问题是多种选择和轶事的混合体。结果。平均答对率为72.4%,不同中心答对率从58.6%到88.2%不等。最难回答的问题为:BA定义(43.2%)、BA发病的关键因素(63.3%)、峰流量法作为BA自我控制的主要方法(61.9%)、固定联合用药(62.6%)。当确定哮喘发作的触发因素(89.2%)、BA诊断的主要方法(89.2%)、BA严重程度的变异(87.1%)、哮喘状态(94.2%)时,结果最好。结论。尽管在支气管哮喘领域有大量的培训和科学文献,但这一领域的知识水平不能令人满意。在某些考点,基本问题的错误率达到41.4%。因此,高等医学院校应加强对支气管哮喘学科的深入研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of senior medical students in the field of bronchial asthma. Final results of the study ASSA (2014-2016)
The aim of study is to estimate the knowledge of medical students at the senior courses of higher schools in the key aspect of bronchial asthma (BA). Materials and methods . The multicentre study was conducted in the Russian Federation in 6 cities (Belgorod, Chelyabinsk, Saratov, Samara, Voronezh & Vladivostok), 139 of higher grade (4th-6th grade) medical students were tested. Knowledge of key aspects of bronchial asthma such as definition, pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment was evaluated through the means of a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions. These questions were a mix of multi choice and anecdotal. Results . The average level of correct answers totaled 72.4% and varied from 58.6% to 88.2% in different centers. The most difficult questions were the following: BA definition (43.2% of correct answers), key factor of BA pathogenesis (63.3%), peak flowmetry as the main method of BA self-control (61.9%), fixed combinations of drugs (62.6%). The best results were shown when defining the following: trigger in the development of an asthmatic attack (89.2%), the main method of BA diagnosis (89.2%), variants of BA severity (87.1%), status asthmaticus (94.2%). Conclusion . Despite the availability of plenty training and scientific literature in bronchial asthma field the level of knowledge in this area cannot be admitted as satisfactory. The level of incorrect answers to basic questions reaches 41.4% in the certain centers. Thus bronchial asthma subject should be studied more thoroughly in the medical higher schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信