{"title":"投票权与公共利益指数:思考","authors":"Matthias Weber","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3284391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the wide variety of voting power indices, the public good index (PGI) is one of the less well-known ones. Holler (forthcoming) posits hypotheses about why this is the case. In response to these hypotheses, I share a few thoughts about voting power in general and about the popularity of the PGI.","PeriodicalId":365899,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voting Power and the Public Good Index: Thoughts\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3284391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the wide variety of voting power indices, the public good index (PGI) is one of the less well-known ones. Holler (forthcoming) posits hypotheses about why this is the case. In response to these hypotheses, I share a few thoughts about voting power in general and about the popularity of the PGI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3284391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3284391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在众多的投票权指标中，公众利益指数(public good index, PGI)是一个不太为人所知的指标。Holler(即将出版)对为什么会出现这种情况提出了假设。作为对这些假设的回应，我分享了一些关于投票权和PGI受欢迎程度的想法。
Among the wide variety of voting power indices, the public good index (PGI) is one of the less well-known ones. Holler (forthcoming) posits hypotheses about why this is the case. In response to these hypotheses, I share a few thoughts about voting power in general and about the popularity of the PGI.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
