wac中BS-MAC和C-MAC的比较

Yuanjun Zuo, Qiao Li, Huagang Xiong, Guangshan Lu
{"title":"wac中BS-MAC和C-MAC的比较","authors":"Yuanjun Zuo, Qiao Li, Huagang Xiong, Guangshan Lu","doi":"10.1109/DASC43569.2019.9081690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increase of research and application in wireless avionics intra-communications (WAIC) and future requirements for efficiency and flexibility, it is important to choose the right mechanism for a wireless aircraft application. The medium access control (MAC) layers are in charge of the organization of resources, scheduling and user access control policies to a common wireless medium. MAC design are also relevant for an optimum performance of WAICs. For avionics, it will make sense to research which access technology fits better the specific requirements. MAC using Chinese remainder theorem (C-MAC) offer lowpower consumption while maintaining low packet latency for large-scale cluster-based wireless avionics network (WAN). C-MAC performs better than existing TDMA-based MAC protocols, BMA and EMAC, in terms of power consumption and average packet latency. Besides several MAC protocol for WAN, Bitmap-assisted shortest job first based MAC (BS-MAC) is an adaptive time division multiple access based MAC protocol for hierarchical WAN. BS-MAC uses small size time slots, the number of which is more than the number of member nodes, that handle adaptive traffic loads of all members in an efficient manner. More specifically, shortest job first (SJF) algorithm is used to schedule time slots to reduces node's job completion time and to minimize the average packet delay of nodes, and short node address is adopted to identify members nodes to reduces the control overhead and makes the proposed scheme an energy efficient. This paper introduces the basic principles of BS-MAC protocol in details, compares it with the properties of the C-MAC protocol. In particular, we first detail the main specifications for WAIC, and discuss pros and cons of the two protocol versus the avionics requirements. Then we compared throughput, energy efficiency and time delay between BS-MAC and C-MAC through simulations. Finally, we analyze which of the two MACs offers more efficiency and flexibility for the requirements of WAIC.","PeriodicalId":129864,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/AIAA 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of BS-MAC and C-MAC for WAIC\",\"authors\":\"Yuanjun Zuo, Qiao Li, Huagang Xiong, Guangshan Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASC43569.2019.9081690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increase of research and application in wireless avionics intra-communications (WAIC) and future requirements for efficiency and flexibility, it is important to choose the right mechanism for a wireless aircraft application. The medium access control (MAC) layers are in charge of the organization of resources, scheduling and user access control policies to a common wireless medium. MAC design are also relevant for an optimum performance of WAICs. For avionics, it will make sense to research which access technology fits better the specific requirements. MAC using Chinese remainder theorem (C-MAC) offer lowpower consumption while maintaining low packet latency for large-scale cluster-based wireless avionics network (WAN). C-MAC performs better than existing TDMA-based MAC protocols, BMA and EMAC, in terms of power consumption and average packet latency. Besides several MAC protocol for WAN, Bitmap-assisted shortest job first based MAC (BS-MAC) is an adaptive time division multiple access based MAC protocol for hierarchical WAN. BS-MAC uses small size time slots, the number of which is more than the number of member nodes, that handle adaptive traffic loads of all members in an efficient manner. More specifically, shortest job first (SJF) algorithm is used to schedule time slots to reduces node's job completion time and to minimize the average packet delay of nodes, and short node address is adopted to identify members nodes to reduces the control overhead and makes the proposed scheme an energy efficient. This paper introduces the basic principles of BS-MAC protocol in details, compares it with the properties of the C-MAC protocol. In particular, we first detail the main specifications for WAIC, and discuss pros and cons of the two protocol versus the avionics requirements. Then we compared throughput, energy efficiency and time delay between BS-MAC and C-MAC through simulations. Finally, we analyze which of the two MACs offers more efficiency and flexibility for the requirements of WAIC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE/AIAA 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE/AIAA 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC43569.2019.9081690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/AIAA 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC43569.2019.9081690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着无线航电内部通信(WAIC)的研究和应用的不断增加以及未来对效率和灵活性的要求,选择合适的无线机载通信机制变得非常重要。介质访问控制(MAC)层负责资源的组织、调度和用户对通用无线介质的访问控制策略。MAC设计也与waic的最佳性能有关。对于航空电子设备来说,研究哪种接入技术更符合具体要求是有意义的。基于中国剩余定理(C-MAC)的MAC为大规模集群无线航空电子网络(WAN)提供了低功耗和低数据包延迟的解决方案。C-MAC在功耗和平均数据包延迟方面优于现有的基于tdma的MAC协议BMA和EMAC。位图辅助的基于最短作业优先的MAC (BS-MAC)是一种基于自适应时分多址的分层广域网MAC协议。BS-MAC采用小于成员节点数的小时隙,有效地处理所有成员的自适应流量负载。具体而言,采用最短作业优先(SJF)算法调度时隙,减少节点作业完成时间,使节点平均数据包延迟最小;采用短节点地址识别成员节点,减少控制开销,提高方案的节能性。本文详细介绍了BS-MAC协议的基本原理,并将其与C-MAC协议的特性进行了比较。特别是,我们首先详细介绍了WAIC的主要规范,并讨论了这两种协议相对于航空电子设备需求的优缺点。然后通过仿真比较了BS-MAC和C-MAC之间的吞吐量、能效和时延。最后,我们分析了两种mac中哪一种更符合WAIC要求的效率和灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of BS-MAC and C-MAC for WAIC
With the increase of research and application in wireless avionics intra-communications (WAIC) and future requirements for efficiency and flexibility, it is important to choose the right mechanism for a wireless aircraft application. The medium access control (MAC) layers are in charge of the organization of resources, scheduling and user access control policies to a common wireless medium. MAC design are also relevant for an optimum performance of WAICs. For avionics, it will make sense to research which access technology fits better the specific requirements. MAC using Chinese remainder theorem (C-MAC) offer lowpower consumption while maintaining low packet latency for large-scale cluster-based wireless avionics network (WAN). C-MAC performs better than existing TDMA-based MAC protocols, BMA and EMAC, in terms of power consumption and average packet latency. Besides several MAC protocol for WAN, Bitmap-assisted shortest job first based MAC (BS-MAC) is an adaptive time division multiple access based MAC protocol for hierarchical WAN. BS-MAC uses small size time slots, the number of which is more than the number of member nodes, that handle adaptive traffic loads of all members in an efficient manner. More specifically, shortest job first (SJF) algorithm is used to schedule time slots to reduces node's job completion time and to minimize the average packet delay of nodes, and short node address is adopted to identify members nodes to reduces the control overhead and makes the proposed scheme an energy efficient. This paper introduces the basic principles of BS-MAC protocol in details, compares it with the properties of the C-MAC protocol. In particular, we first detail the main specifications for WAIC, and discuss pros and cons of the two protocol versus the avionics requirements. Then we compared throughput, energy efficiency and time delay between BS-MAC and C-MAC through simulations. Finally, we analyze which of the two MACs offers more efficiency and flexibility for the requirements of WAIC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信