{"title":"BSS算法的比较","authors":"Y. Singh, C. Rai","doi":"10.1109/IJCNN.2001.939484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several gradient-based algorithms exist for performing blind source separation (BSS). In this paper we compare three most popular neural algorithms: EASI, natural gradient and Bell-Sejnowski algorithms. The effectiveness of these algorithms depends upon the nonlinear activation function. These algorithms were evaluated with different nonlinear functions for sub-Gaussian and super-Gaussian sources.","PeriodicalId":346955,"journal":{"name":"IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of BSS algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Y. Singh, C. Rai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IJCNN.2001.939484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several gradient-based algorithms exist for performing blind source separation (BSS). In this paper we compare three most popular neural algorithms: EASI, natural gradient and Bell-Sejnowski algorithms. The effectiveness of these algorithms depends upon the nonlinear activation function. These algorithms were evaluated with different nonlinear functions for sub-Gaussian and super-Gaussian sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222)\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2001.939484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2001.939484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Several gradient-based algorithms exist for performing blind source separation (BSS). In this paper we compare three most popular neural algorithms: EASI, natural gradient and Bell-Sejnowski algorithms. The effectiveness of these algorithms depends upon the nonlinear activation function. These algorithms were evaluated with different nonlinear functions for sub-Gaussian and super-Gaussian sources.