BSS算法的比较

Y. Singh, C. Rai
{"title":"BSS算法的比较","authors":"Y. Singh, C. Rai","doi":"10.1109/IJCNN.2001.939484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several gradient-based algorithms exist for performing blind source separation (BSS). In this paper we compare three most popular neural algorithms: EASI, natural gradient and Bell-Sejnowski algorithms. The effectiveness of these algorithms depends upon the nonlinear activation function. These algorithms were evaluated with different nonlinear functions for sub-Gaussian and super-Gaussian sources.","PeriodicalId":346955,"journal":{"name":"IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of BSS algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Y. Singh, C. Rai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IJCNN.2001.939484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several gradient-based algorithms exist for performing blind source separation (BSS). In this paper we compare three most popular neural algorithms: EASI, natural gradient and Bell-Sejnowski algorithms. The effectiveness of these algorithms depends upon the nonlinear activation function. These algorithms were evaluated with different nonlinear functions for sub-Gaussian and super-Gaussian sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222)\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2001.939484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2001.939484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目前已有几种基于梯度的盲源分离(BSS)算法。本文比较了三种最流行的神经算法:EASI、自然梯度和Bell-Sejnowski算法。这些算法的有效性取决于非线性激活函数。针对亚高斯和超高斯源,用不同的非线性函数对这些算法进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of BSS algorithms
Several gradient-based algorithms exist for performing blind source separation (BSS). In this paper we compare three most popular neural algorithms: EASI, natural gradient and Bell-Sejnowski algorithms. The effectiveness of these algorithms depends upon the nonlinear activation function. These algorithms were evaluated with different nonlinear functions for sub-Gaussian and super-Gaussian sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信