基于区域地震危险性的阿曼地震规范与国际规范比较

M. Waris, K. Al-Jabri, I. El-Hussain
{"title":"基于区域地震危险性的阿曼地震规范与国际规范比较","authors":"M. Waris, K. Al-Jabri, I. El-Hussain","doi":"10.53540/tjer.vol19iss1pp1-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oman Seismic Code (OSC) was developed in 2013 to provide guidelines for seismic analysis and design of buildings in the Sultanate of Oman. Prior to its development, specifications of Uniform Building Code 1997 (UBC) and International Building Code 2006 (IBC) were used. This study compares base shear, lateral force distribution, and effective storey drift obtained from the three seismic codes using equivalent static load and response spectrum analysis methods. Reinforced concrete buildings with 25m x 40m plan having columns at 5m spacing are used; 3-, 6-, 13- and 19- storeys are considered having height of 10m, 19m, 40m and 58m, respectively. The buildings were considered as having normal occupancy condition, resting on very dense soil (type-C). The study considered low and normal ductility classes defined by the OSC and compared Zone-1 of OSC with Zone-1 of UBC and IBC. OSC provided slightly higher values (20% - 35% higher) of base shear than IBC and UBC for the low ductility class. For the normal ductility class, it provided marginally lower (9% - 12% lower) values for 6-, 13- and 19-storey buildings while a higher value for the 3-storey building. The storey shear force and storey drift from the OSC also compared well with the international counterparts. Muscat that is Zone-1 of OSC is equivalent to Zone-1 of UBC and IBC.","PeriodicalId":390710,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER]","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF OMAN SEISMIC CODE WITH INTERNATIONAL COUNTERPARTS BASED ON REGIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD\",\"authors\":\"M. Waris, K. Al-Jabri, I. El-Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.53540/tjer.vol19iss1pp1-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oman Seismic Code (OSC) was developed in 2013 to provide guidelines for seismic analysis and design of buildings in the Sultanate of Oman. Prior to its development, specifications of Uniform Building Code 1997 (UBC) and International Building Code 2006 (IBC) were used. This study compares base shear, lateral force distribution, and effective storey drift obtained from the three seismic codes using equivalent static load and response spectrum analysis methods. Reinforced concrete buildings with 25m x 40m plan having columns at 5m spacing are used; 3-, 6-, 13- and 19- storeys are considered having height of 10m, 19m, 40m and 58m, respectively. The buildings were considered as having normal occupancy condition, resting on very dense soil (type-C). The study considered low and normal ductility classes defined by the OSC and compared Zone-1 of OSC with Zone-1 of UBC and IBC. OSC provided slightly higher values (20% - 35% higher) of base shear than IBC and UBC for the low ductility class. For the normal ductility class, it provided marginally lower (9% - 12% lower) values for 6-, 13- and 19-storey buildings while a higher value for the 3-storey building. The storey shear force and storey drift from the OSC also compared well with the international counterparts. Muscat that is Zone-1 of OSC is equivalent to Zone-1 of UBC and IBC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER]\",\"volume\":\"173 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53540/tjer.vol19iss1pp1-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53540/tjer.vol19iss1pp1-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿曼地震规范(OSC)于2013年制定,为阿曼苏丹国建筑的地震分析和设计提供指导。在其开发之前,使用了1997年统一建筑规范(UBC)和国际建筑规范2006 (IBC)的规范。本研究采用等效静荷载和反应谱分析方法,比较了三种地震规范中得到的基础剪力、侧向力分布和有效层位移。采用钢筋混凝土建筑,平面为25米× 40米,柱间距为5米;3层、6层、13层和19层的高度分别为10米、19米、40米和58米。这些建筑被认为具有正常的使用条件,坐落在非常致密的土壤上(c类)。该研究考虑了由盐含量定义的低延展性和正常延展性等级,并将盐含量的Zone-1与UBC和IBC的Zone-1进行了比较。对于低延性等级,OSC比IBC和UBC提供了稍高的基础剪切值(高出20% - 35%)。对于普通延性等级,6层、13层和19层建筑的数值略低(低9% - 12%),而3层建筑的数值较高。盐砂结构的层间剪力和层间漂移也与国际上的水平相当。Muscat是OSC的Zone-1,相当于UBC和IBC的Zone-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF OMAN SEISMIC CODE WITH INTERNATIONAL COUNTERPARTS BASED ON REGIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD
Oman Seismic Code (OSC) was developed in 2013 to provide guidelines for seismic analysis and design of buildings in the Sultanate of Oman. Prior to its development, specifications of Uniform Building Code 1997 (UBC) and International Building Code 2006 (IBC) were used. This study compares base shear, lateral force distribution, and effective storey drift obtained from the three seismic codes using equivalent static load and response spectrum analysis methods. Reinforced concrete buildings with 25m x 40m plan having columns at 5m spacing are used; 3-, 6-, 13- and 19- storeys are considered having height of 10m, 19m, 40m and 58m, respectively. The buildings were considered as having normal occupancy condition, resting on very dense soil (type-C). The study considered low and normal ductility classes defined by the OSC and compared Zone-1 of OSC with Zone-1 of UBC and IBC. OSC provided slightly higher values (20% - 35% higher) of base shear than IBC and UBC for the low ductility class. For the normal ductility class, it provided marginally lower (9% - 12% lower) values for 6-, 13- and 19-storey buildings while a higher value for the 3-storey building. The storey shear force and storey drift from the OSC also compared well with the international counterparts. Muscat that is Zone-1 of OSC is equivalent to Zone-1 of UBC and IBC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信