差动驱动机器人PI控制器与MRAC的性能对比分析

A. Khalil, S. Mukhopadhyay, H. Rehman
{"title":"差动驱动机器人PI控制器与MRAC的性能对比分析","authors":"A. Khalil, S. Mukhopadhyay, H. Rehman","doi":"10.1109/ICCSPA55860.2022.10019165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the performance of two control techniques on a DC motor-driven differential drive robot. Regular cascaded PI controller is the first scheme. In the second scheme, the outer PI controller is replaced by direct model reference adaptive control (MRAC). The main objective of the motor controller is that it follows a desired angular speed. Both schemes are compared in terms of average absolute speed error and power consumption. Preliminary simulations are performed on a DC motor model; whereas, experimental runs are done on a differentially driven robot powered by DC motors, to compare the performance of both control laws. It is found that the control scheme with MRAC has lesser speed error and power consumption compared to the PI controller, both in simulation and the experimental investigation.","PeriodicalId":106639,"journal":{"name":"2022 5th International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Performance Analysis of PI Controller and MRAC for a Differential Drive Robot\",\"authors\":\"A. Khalil, S. Mukhopadhyay, H. Rehman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCSPA55860.2022.10019165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the performance of two control techniques on a DC motor-driven differential drive robot. Regular cascaded PI controller is the first scheme. In the second scheme, the outer PI controller is replaced by direct model reference adaptive control (MRAC). The main objective of the motor controller is that it follows a desired angular speed. Both schemes are compared in terms of average absolute speed error and power consumption. Preliminary simulations are performed on a DC motor model; whereas, experimental runs are done on a differentially driven robot powered by DC motors, to compare the performance of both control laws. It is found that the control scheme with MRAC has lesser speed error and power consumption compared to the PI controller, both in simulation and the experimental investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 5th International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 5th International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSPA55860.2022.10019165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 5th International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSPA55860.2022.10019165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了直流电机驱动的差动驱动机器人的两种控制技术的性能。规则级联PI控制器是第一种方案。在第二种方案中,外部PI控制器被直接模型参考自适应控制(MRAC)取代。电机控制器的主要目标是使其遵循期望的角速度。两种方案在平均绝对速度误差和功耗方面进行了比较。在直流电机模型上进行了初步仿真;然而,在直流电机驱动的差分驱动机器人上进行了实验运行,以比较两种控制律的性能。仿真和实验研究表明,与PI控制器相比,MRAC控制方案具有更小的速度误差和功耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Performance Analysis of PI Controller and MRAC for a Differential Drive Robot
This paper compares the performance of two control techniques on a DC motor-driven differential drive robot. Regular cascaded PI controller is the first scheme. In the second scheme, the outer PI controller is replaced by direct model reference adaptive control (MRAC). The main objective of the motor controller is that it follows a desired angular speed. Both schemes are compared in terms of average absolute speed error and power consumption. Preliminary simulations are performed on a DC motor model; whereas, experimental runs are done on a differentially driven robot powered by DC motors, to compare the performance of both control laws. It is found that the control scheme with MRAC has lesser speed error and power consumption compared to the PI controller, both in simulation and the experimental investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信