多个夏普比率相等性的检验

J. Wright, S. Yam, Siu Pang Yung
{"title":"多个夏普比率相等性的检验","authors":"J. Wright, S. Yam, Siu Pang Yung","doi":"10.21314/JOR.2014.289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a test for the equality of multiple Sharpe ratios. First we extend the multivariate Sharpe ratio statistic of Leung and Wong for the case when excess returns are independently and identically distributed. We then provide a test that holds under the much more general assumption that the excess returns are stationary and ergodic, making use of the generalized method of moments and heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent estimation of covariance matrixes. We repeat Leung and Wong’s testing for equality of the Sharpe ratios f 18 iShares using our new tests and conclude that the hypothesis of equality cannot be rejected at the 1% level.","PeriodicalId":365755,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Test for the Equality of Multiple Sharpe Ratios\",\"authors\":\"J. Wright, S. Yam, Siu Pang Yung\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/JOR.2014.289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a test for the equality of multiple Sharpe ratios. First we extend the multivariate Sharpe ratio statistic of Leung and Wong for the case when excess returns are independently and identically distributed. We then provide a test that holds under the much more general assumption that the excess returns are stationary and ergodic, making use of the generalized method of moments and heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent estimation of covariance matrixes. We repeat Leung and Wong’s testing for equality of the Sharpe ratios f 18 iShares using our new tests and conclude that the hypothesis of equality cannot be rejected at the 1% level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2014.289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2014.289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

本文给出了多个夏普比率相等性的检验方法。首先,我们推广了Leung和Wong在超额收益独立同分布情况下的多元夏普比统计量。然后,我们提供了一个检验,在更一般的假设下,即超额收益是平稳的和遍历的,利用广义矩法和异方差和协方差矩阵的自相关一致估计。我们使用我们的新检验重复Leung和Wong对18支iShares的夏普比率相等的检验,并得出结论,在1%的水平上不能拒绝相等的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Test for the Equality of Multiple Sharpe Ratios
This paper provides a test for the equality of multiple Sharpe ratios. First we extend the multivariate Sharpe ratio statistic of Leung and Wong for the case when excess returns are independently and identically distributed. We then provide a test that holds under the much more general assumption that the excess returns are stationary and ergodic, making use of the generalized method of moments and heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent estimation of covariance matrixes. We repeat Leung and Wong’s testing for equality of the Sharpe ratios f 18 iShares using our new tests and conclude that the hypothesis of equality cannot be rejected at the 1% level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信