到底是谁的赤字?对水力压裂法持怀疑态度的公众的制度性误解

Laurence Williams, P. Macnaghten, E. Turnhout, W. Tuinstra, W. Halffman
{"title":"到底是谁的赤字?对水力压裂法持怀疑态度的公众的制度性误解","authors":"Laurence Williams, P. Macnaghten, E. Turnhout, W. Tuinstra, W. Halffman","doi":"10.1017/9781316162514.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a relatively new technique used to extract oil or natural gas. It is a highly contested technique, with often-fierce disagreements about its safety and environmental impacts between experts, governments, oil companies, and inhabitants. This case focuses on public resistance to fracking, offering a useful illustration of the limitations of the information deficit model (Section 4.4) and showing that controversies cannot be resolved by assuming that opposing actors suffer from an information deficit that can be rectified by means of better communication and greater public understanding of science","PeriodicalId":140899,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Expertise","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics\",\"authors\":\"Laurence Williams, P. Macnaghten, E. Turnhout, W. Tuinstra, W. Halffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781316162514.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a relatively new technique used to extract oil or natural gas. It is a highly contested technique, with often-fierce disagreements about its safety and environmental impacts between experts, governments, oil companies, and inhabitants. This case focuses on public resistance to fracking, offering a useful illustration of the limitations of the information deficit model (Section 4.4) and showing that controversies cannot be resolved by assuming that opposing actors suffer from an information deficit that can be rectified by means of better communication and greater public understanding of science\",\"PeriodicalId\":140899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Expertise\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Expertise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162514.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Expertise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162514.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

水力压裂法是一种用于提取石油或天然气的相对较新的技术。这是一项备受争议的技术,专家、政府、石油公司和居民对其安全性和环境影响经常存在激烈分歧。本案例关注公众对水力压裂法的抵制,对信息缺失模型的局限性提供了一个有用的说明(第4.4节),并表明争议不能通过假设对立行为者遭受信息缺失来解决,而信息缺失可以通过更好的沟通和更大的公众对科学的理解来纠正
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a relatively new technique used to extract oil or natural gas. It is a highly contested technique, with often-fierce disagreements about its safety and environmental impacts between experts, governments, oil companies, and inhabitants. This case focuses on public resistance to fracking, offering a useful illustration of the limitations of the information deficit model (Section 4.4) and showing that controversies cannot be resolved by assuming that opposing actors suffer from an information deficit that can be rectified by means of better communication and greater public understanding of science
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信