{"title":"所有人的算法思维:动机视角","authors":"Z. Kátai","doi":"10.1145/2591708.2602669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We proposed to investigate whether properly calibrated learning tools can effectively promote algorithmic thinking among both (S)ciences and (H)umanities oriented students. Our investigation revealed that there are no unbridgeable motivational differences between the way these two learning communities relate to e-learning processes aimed at promoting algorithmic thinking.","PeriodicalId":334476,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithmic thinking for ALL: a motivational perspective\",\"authors\":\"Z. Kátai\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2591708.2602669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We proposed to investigate whether properly calibrated learning tools can effectively promote algorithmic thinking among both (S)ciences and (H)umanities oriented students. Our investigation revealed that there are no unbridgeable motivational differences between the way these two learning communities relate to e-learning processes aimed at promoting algorithmic thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2602669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2602669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Algorithmic thinking for ALL: a motivational perspective
We proposed to investigate whether properly calibrated learning tools can effectively promote algorithmic thinking among both (S)ciences and (H)umanities oriented students. Our investigation revealed that there are no unbridgeable motivational differences between the way these two learning communities relate to e-learning processes aimed at promoting algorithmic thinking.