基于2型糖尿病治疗推荐模型的遗传算法与人工神经网络多类分类比较研究

Siddhi Khanse, Payal Bhandari, Rumjhum Singru, Neha Runwal, Atharva Dharane
{"title":"基于2型糖尿病治疗推荐模型的遗传算法与人工神经网络多类分类比较研究","authors":"Siddhi Khanse, Payal Bhandari, Rumjhum Singru, Neha Runwal, Atharva Dharane","doi":"10.1109/PDGC50313.2020.9315837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-class Classification is often used for classification and categorization purposes under Machine Learning wherein vast datasets can be classified into multiple labels/classes. It is often perceived as more complex than binary classification and is still being explored and studied. The main objective of this paper is to perform a comparative study of Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network to identify the algorithm that enhances the accuracy of multi-class classification. The experimental results obtained in the comparative study are evaluated using our model developed for Type-2 Diabetes Individualistic Treatment Recommendation, which successfully implements multiclass classification of patients into 7 classes(Treatment Line). Presently, doctors prescribe drugs by using their knowledge and experience, but they require a faster and more efficient system to assist them in taking the final decision by providing a suitable suggestion about the treatment line. The dataset used by our model consists of 24 input attributes and 7 output class of 2430 individuals having different characteristics like hypertension etc to make it as diverse as possible. While comparing the benefits and drawbacks of these two algorithms on our model, we have considered factors such as accuracy, training, testing and complexity. Among the two types of classifier the ANN classifier leverages the performance of the system by giving the most accurate result and generating the prediction accuracy of 92%. Thus, based on the comparative study ANN classifier demonstrates better prediction results than evolutionary Genetic Algorithm.","PeriodicalId":347216,"journal":{"name":"2020 Sixth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","volume":"19 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network for Multi-class Classification based on Type-2 Diabetes Treatment Recommendation model\",\"authors\":\"Siddhi Khanse, Payal Bhandari, Rumjhum Singru, Neha Runwal, Atharva Dharane\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PDGC50313.2020.9315837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multi-class Classification is often used for classification and categorization purposes under Machine Learning wherein vast datasets can be classified into multiple labels/classes. It is often perceived as more complex than binary classification and is still being explored and studied. The main objective of this paper is to perform a comparative study of Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network to identify the algorithm that enhances the accuracy of multi-class classification. The experimental results obtained in the comparative study are evaluated using our model developed for Type-2 Diabetes Individualistic Treatment Recommendation, which successfully implements multiclass classification of patients into 7 classes(Treatment Line). Presently, doctors prescribe drugs by using their knowledge and experience, but they require a faster and more efficient system to assist them in taking the final decision by providing a suitable suggestion about the treatment line. The dataset used by our model consists of 24 input attributes and 7 output class of 2430 individuals having different characteristics like hypertension etc to make it as diverse as possible. While comparing the benefits and drawbacks of these two algorithms on our model, we have considered factors such as accuracy, training, testing and complexity. Among the two types of classifier the ANN classifier leverages the performance of the system by giving the most accurate result and generating the prediction accuracy of 92%. Thus, based on the comparative study ANN classifier demonstrates better prediction results than evolutionary Genetic Algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Sixth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Sixth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC50313.2020.9315837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Sixth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC50313.2020.9315837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多类分类通常用于机器学习下的分类和分类目的,其中大量数据集可以分为多个标签/类。它通常被认为比二元分类更复杂,并且仍在探索和研究中。本文的主要目的是对遗传算法和人工神经网络进行比较研究,找出提高多类分类准确率的算法。对比研究中获得的实验结果使用我们开发的2型糖尿病个体化治疗推荐模型进行评估,该模型成功地将患者分为7类(治疗线)。目前,医生利用他们的知识和经验开药,但他们需要一个更快、更有效的系统,通过提供合适的治疗建议来帮助他们做出最终决定。我们的模型使用的数据集由24个输入属性和7个输出类别组成,其中2430个个体具有不同的特征,如高血压等,以使其尽可能多样化。在比较这两种算法在我们模型上的优缺点时,我们考虑了准确性、训练、测试和复杂性等因素。在这两种分类器中,人工神经网络分类器通过给出最准确的结果并产生92%的预测准确率来利用系统的性能。因此,通过对比研究,ANN分类器的预测效果优于进化遗传算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network for Multi-class Classification based on Type-2 Diabetes Treatment Recommendation model
Multi-class Classification is often used for classification and categorization purposes under Machine Learning wherein vast datasets can be classified into multiple labels/classes. It is often perceived as more complex than binary classification and is still being explored and studied. The main objective of this paper is to perform a comparative study of Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network to identify the algorithm that enhances the accuracy of multi-class classification. The experimental results obtained in the comparative study are evaluated using our model developed for Type-2 Diabetes Individualistic Treatment Recommendation, which successfully implements multiclass classification of patients into 7 classes(Treatment Line). Presently, doctors prescribe drugs by using their knowledge and experience, but they require a faster and more efficient system to assist them in taking the final decision by providing a suitable suggestion about the treatment line. The dataset used by our model consists of 24 input attributes and 7 output class of 2430 individuals having different characteristics like hypertension etc to make it as diverse as possible. While comparing the benefits and drawbacks of these two algorithms on our model, we have considered factors such as accuracy, training, testing and complexity. Among the two types of classifier the ANN classifier leverages the performance of the system by giving the most accurate result and generating the prediction accuracy of 92%. Thus, based on the comparative study ANN classifier demonstrates better prediction results than evolutionary Genetic Algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信