大脑中意识和综合能量的差异

R. Pepperell
{"title":"大脑中意识和综合能量的差异","authors":"R. Pepperell","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/fvjt2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To understand consciousness within the framework of natural science we must acknowledge the role of energy in the brain. Many contemporary neuroscientists regard the brain as an information processor. However, evidence from brain imaging experiments demonstrates that the brain is actually a voracious consumer of energy, and that functionality is intimately tied to metabolism. Maintaining a critical level of energy in the brain is required to sustain consciousness, and the organisation of this energy distinguishes conscious from unconscious states. Meanwhile, contemporary physicists often regard energy as an abstract mathematical property. But this view neglects energy's causal efficacy and actuality, as identified by Aristotle and later appreciated by many important biologists, psychologists and physicists. By reconsidering the nature of energy and recasting its role in neural activity, we arrive at a theory of consciousness that is consistent with the laws of physics, chemistry and biology. The argument draws on the integrated information theory (IIT) developed by Tononi et al. but reinterprets their findings from the perspective of energy exchange. In IIT, the conscious state in a system, such as a brain, is defined by the quantity of integrated differences, or information, it contains. According to the approach outlined here, it is in the nature of energy to manifest differences of motion and tension. The level of complexity of the energy differences in a system determines its conscious state. Consciousness occurs because, in Nagel's terminology, there is 'something it is like' to be a sufficiently complex state of energy differences.","PeriodicalId":298664,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Neurons and Cognition","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consciousness and integrated energy differences in the brain\",\"authors\":\"R. Pepperell\",\"doi\":\"10.31234/osf.io/fvjt2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To understand consciousness within the framework of natural science we must acknowledge the role of energy in the brain. Many contemporary neuroscientists regard the brain as an information processor. However, evidence from brain imaging experiments demonstrates that the brain is actually a voracious consumer of energy, and that functionality is intimately tied to metabolism. Maintaining a critical level of energy in the brain is required to sustain consciousness, and the organisation of this energy distinguishes conscious from unconscious states. Meanwhile, contemporary physicists often regard energy as an abstract mathematical property. But this view neglects energy's causal efficacy and actuality, as identified by Aristotle and later appreciated by many important biologists, psychologists and physicists. By reconsidering the nature of energy and recasting its role in neural activity, we arrive at a theory of consciousness that is consistent with the laws of physics, chemistry and biology. The argument draws on the integrated information theory (IIT) developed by Tononi et al. but reinterprets their findings from the perspective of energy exchange. In IIT, the conscious state in a system, such as a brain, is defined by the quantity of integrated differences, or information, it contains. According to the approach outlined here, it is in the nature of energy to manifest differences of motion and tension. The level of complexity of the energy differences in a system determines its conscious state. Consciousness occurs because, in Nagel's terminology, there is 'something it is like' to be a sufficiently complex state of energy differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Neurons and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"219 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Neurons and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fvjt2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Neurons and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fvjt2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

要在自然科学的框架内理解意识,我们必须承认能量在大脑中的作用。许多当代神经科学家认为大脑是一个信息处理器。然而,来自脑成像实验的证据表明,大脑实际上是一个贪婪的能量消耗者,其功能与新陈代谢密切相关。维持意识需要在大脑中维持一个临界水平的能量,而这种能量的组织将意识状态与无意识状态区分开来。同时,当代物理学家往往把能量看作一种抽象的数学性质。但这种观点忽视了能量的因果效应和现实性,正如亚里士多德所指出的那样,后来被许多重要的生物学家、心理学家和物理学家所赞赏。通过重新考虑能量的本质,重新定义它在神经活动中的作用,我们得出了一个与物理、化学和生物学定律一致的意识理论。该论点借鉴了托诺尼等人提出的综合信息理论(IIT),但从能源交换的角度重新解释了他们的发现。在IIT中,系统(如大脑)中的意识状态是由其包含的综合差异或信息的数量来定义的。根据这里概述的方法,能量的本质是表现出运动和紧张的差异。系统中能量差异的复杂程度决定了它的意识状态。用内格尔的术语来说,意识的产生是因为存在一种足够复杂的能量差异状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consciousness and integrated energy differences in the brain
To understand consciousness within the framework of natural science we must acknowledge the role of energy in the brain. Many contemporary neuroscientists regard the brain as an information processor. However, evidence from brain imaging experiments demonstrates that the brain is actually a voracious consumer of energy, and that functionality is intimately tied to metabolism. Maintaining a critical level of energy in the brain is required to sustain consciousness, and the organisation of this energy distinguishes conscious from unconscious states. Meanwhile, contemporary physicists often regard energy as an abstract mathematical property. But this view neglects energy's causal efficacy and actuality, as identified by Aristotle and later appreciated by many important biologists, psychologists and physicists. By reconsidering the nature of energy and recasting its role in neural activity, we arrive at a theory of consciousness that is consistent with the laws of physics, chemistry and biology. The argument draws on the integrated information theory (IIT) developed by Tononi et al. but reinterprets their findings from the perspective of energy exchange. In IIT, the conscious state in a system, such as a brain, is defined by the quantity of integrated differences, or information, it contains. According to the approach outlined here, it is in the nature of energy to manifest differences of motion and tension. The level of complexity of the energy differences in a system determines its conscious state. Consciousness occurs because, in Nagel's terminology, there is 'something it is like' to be a sufficiently complex state of energy differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信