汉语口语对话中回声疑问句翻译的韵律线索

Ai-jun Li, G. Huang, Zhiqiang Li
{"title":"汉语口语对话中回声疑问句翻译的韵律线索","authors":"Ai-jun Li, G. Huang, Zhiqiang Li","doi":"10.1109/APSIPAASC47483.2019.9023150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the effect of prosodic cues in the disambiguation of five discourse-pragmatic functions of echo questions and the corresponding statements in Chinese spoken dialogues. Data were collected in a “role-play” format to mimic different communicative functions of echo questions in real-life situations. Statistical analyses were performed on both global and local F0 variations associated with intonation patterns in echo questions and corresponding statements. Results showed that boundary tone features alone are not good predictors in distinguishing echo questions and statements; variations in intonation patterns are related to the different discourse-pragmatic functions that echo questions serve; echo questions and statements, as well as different discourse-pragmatic functions of echo questions, can be distinguished on the basis of global variations of prosodic features such as overall F0 slope and average F0, combined with local changes due to boundary tone features; and when information about morpho-syntactic structures and boundary tone features were included in the analysis, the accuracy of discriminant analysis was at 76.5%∼94.1% for statements and echo questions, and at 57.6%∼83.5% for different discourse-pragmatic functions. The accuracy dropped to 70.9% (2 groups) and 40.9% (6 groups) when morpho-syntactic structural information was not included, indicating that structural and contextual information contributed 30% and 60% respectively.","PeriodicalId":145222,"journal":{"name":"2019 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prosodic Cues in the Interpretation of Echo Questions in Chinese Spoken Dialogues\",\"authors\":\"Ai-jun Li, G. Huang, Zhiqiang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSIPAASC47483.2019.9023150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the effect of prosodic cues in the disambiguation of five discourse-pragmatic functions of echo questions and the corresponding statements in Chinese spoken dialogues. Data were collected in a “role-play” format to mimic different communicative functions of echo questions in real-life situations. Statistical analyses were performed on both global and local F0 variations associated with intonation patterns in echo questions and corresponding statements. Results showed that boundary tone features alone are not good predictors in distinguishing echo questions and statements; variations in intonation patterns are related to the different discourse-pragmatic functions that echo questions serve; echo questions and statements, as well as different discourse-pragmatic functions of echo questions, can be distinguished on the basis of global variations of prosodic features such as overall F0 slope and average F0, combined with local changes due to boundary tone features; and when information about morpho-syntactic structures and boundary tone features were included in the analysis, the accuracy of discriminant analysis was at 76.5%∼94.1% for statements and echo questions, and at 57.6%∼83.5% for different discourse-pragmatic functions. The accuracy dropped to 70.9% (2 groups) and 40.9% (6 groups) when morpho-syntactic structural information was not included, indicating that structural and contextual information contributed 30% and 60% respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPAASC47483.2019.9023150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPAASC47483.2019.9023150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究考察了韵律线索在汉语口语对话中回声疑问句及其相应语句的五种语用功能消歧中的作用。数据以“角色扮演”的形式收集,以模拟现实生活中不同的回声问题的交际功能。统计分析了回声疑问句和相应语句中语调模式的全球和局部F0变化。结果表明,单独的边界语调特征不能很好地预测重复疑问句和重复陈述句的区别;语调模式的变化与反问语用功能的不同有关;根据整体F0斜率和平均F0等韵律特征的全局变化,结合边界音调特征引起的局部变化,可以区分回声疑问句和回声陈述句及其不同的语篇语用功能;当分析中包含有关形态句法结构和边界语气特征的信息时,对陈述句和回声疑问句的判别分析准确率为76.5% ~ 94.1%,对不同语篇语用功能的判别分析准确率为57.6% ~ 83.5%。当不包含形态句法结构信息时,准确率分别为70.9%(2组)和40.9%(6组),表明结构信息和语境信息分别贡献了30%和60%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prosodic Cues in the Interpretation of Echo Questions in Chinese Spoken Dialogues
This study examines the effect of prosodic cues in the disambiguation of five discourse-pragmatic functions of echo questions and the corresponding statements in Chinese spoken dialogues. Data were collected in a “role-play” format to mimic different communicative functions of echo questions in real-life situations. Statistical analyses were performed on both global and local F0 variations associated with intonation patterns in echo questions and corresponding statements. Results showed that boundary tone features alone are not good predictors in distinguishing echo questions and statements; variations in intonation patterns are related to the different discourse-pragmatic functions that echo questions serve; echo questions and statements, as well as different discourse-pragmatic functions of echo questions, can be distinguished on the basis of global variations of prosodic features such as overall F0 slope and average F0, combined with local changes due to boundary tone features; and when information about morpho-syntactic structures and boundary tone features were included in the analysis, the accuracy of discriminant analysis was at 76.5%∼94.1% for statements and echo questions, and at 57.6%∼83.5% for different discourse-pragmatic functions. The accuracy dropped to 70.9% (2 groups) and 40.9% (6 groups) when morpho-syntactic structural information was not included, indicating that structural and contextual information contributed 30% and 60% respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信