最近的萨克雷研究:2009-2022

Jonathan Farina
{"title":"最近的萨克雷研究:2009-2022","authors":"Jonathan Farina","doi":"10.5325/dickstudannu.53.2.0322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Thackeray's presence in recent scholarship, on present-day syllabi, and on present-day nightstands still pales in comparison to his popularity in the Victorian period and to the relative investments we have in Dickens, Eliot, and other Victorians. But the last twelve or so years nevertheless feel like something of a Thackeray resurgence, at least in scholarship. This article reviews here more than twenty-five pieces of scholarship, a fifth of what we might typically see on Dickens in the same period, but that scholarship includes some exciting, insightful, and transformative thinking, particularly about genre and prose style. Reasons innumerable weigh against a revival of Thackeray's popularity, foremost of which may simply be the length of his mature work, which can be too difficult to balance with other texts on syllabi sensitive to the attention spans and extracurricular demands of many students. As it happens, inattention, interruption, productive reverie, and distraction are the preeminent virtues that Nicholas Dames ascribes to Thackeray's fiction and Victorian theories of fiction in \"Distraction's Negative Liberty: Thackeray and Attention,\" from The Physiology of the Novel (2007), which is unquestionably one of the most perceptive, ingenious, and influential accounts of Thackeray in the past twenty-five years.","PeriodicalId":195639,"journal":{"name":"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Thackeray Studies: 2009–2022\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Farina\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/dickstudannu.53.2.0322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Thackeray's presence in recent scholarship, on present-day syllabi, and on present-day nightstands still pales in comparison to his popularity in the Victorian period and to the relative investments we have in Dickens, Eliot, and other Victorians. But the last twelve or so years nevertheless feel like something of a Thackeray resurgence, at least in scholarship. This article reviews here more than twenty-five pieces of scholarship, a fifth of what we might typically see on Dickens in the same period, but that scholarship includes some exciting, insightful, and transformative thinking, particularly about genre and prose style. Reasons innumerable weigh against a revival of Thackeray's popularity, foremost of which may simply be the length of his mature work, which can be too difficult to balance with other texts on syllabi sensitive to the attention spans and extracurricular demands of many students. As it happens, inattention, interruption, productive reverie, and distraction are the preeminent virtues that Nicholas Dames ascribes to Thackeray's fiction and Victorian theories of fiction in \\\"Distraction's Negative Liberty: Thackeray and Attention,\\\" from The Physiology of the Novel (2007), which is unquestionably one of the most perceptive, ingenious, and influential accounts of Thackeray in the past twenty-five years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":195639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/dickstudannu.53.2.0322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dickens Studies Annual: Essays on Victorian Fiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/dickstudannu.53.2.0322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与他在维多利亚时代的受欢迎程度以及我们对狄更斯、艾略特和其他维多利亚时代作家的相关投入相比,萨克雷在当代学术、教学纲要和床头柜上的存在仍然相形见绌。但过去12年左右的时间感觉像是萨克雷的复兴,至少在学术领域是这样。这篇文章在这里回顾了超过25篇学术研究,是我们在同一时期通常看到的关于狄更斯的研究的五分之一,但这些学术研究包括了一些令人兴奋的、有见地的和变革性的思考,特别是关于体裁和散文风格的思考。有无数的理由反对萨克雷的复兴,其中最重要的原因可能仅仅是他成熟的作品的长度,这可能很难与其他文本在教学大纲上保持平衡,这对许多学生的注意力持续时间和课外需求很敏感。事实上,在2007年出版的《小说的生理学》一书中,尼古拉斯·达姆斯把注意力不集中、被打断、富有成效的遐想和注意力分散这些卓越的优点归功于萨克雷的小说和维多利亚时代的小说理论。这本书无疑是过去25年来对萨克雷最敏锐、最巧妙、最具影响力的描述之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent Thackeray Studies: 2009–2022
abstract:Thackeray's presence in recent scholarship, on present-day syllabi, and on present-day nightstands still pales in comparison to his popularity in the Victorian period and to the relative investments we have in Dickens, Eliot, and other Victorians. But the last twelve or so years nevertheless feel like something of a Thackeray resurgence, at least in scholarship. This article reviews here more than twenty-five pieces of scholarship, a fifth of what we might typically see on Dickens in the same period, but that scholarship includes some exciting, insightful, and transformative thinking, particularly about genre and prose style. Reasons innumerable weigh against a revival of Thackeray's popularity, foremost of which may simply be the length of his mature work, which can be too difficult to balance with other texts on syllabi sensitive to the attention spans and extracurricular demands of many students. As it happens, inattention, interruption, productive reverie, and distraction are the preeminent virtues that Nicholas Dames ascribes to Thackeray's fiction and Victorian theories of fiction in "Distraction's Negative Liberty: Thackeray and Attention," from The Physiology of the Novel (2007), which is unquestionably one of the most perceptive, ingenious, and influential accounts of Thackeray in the past twenty-five years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信