欧盟差别化一体化的未来:税收微观世界

Maria Kendrick
{"title":"欧盟差别化一体化的未来:税收微观世界","authors":"Maria Kendrick","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3659322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The EU’s path of integration sees it adopt harmonizing agendas in many areas of EU law. As they touch on areas of Member State sovereignty, these agendas are proving difficult to achieve, either without significant reform, or at all. As a consequence, the future development of EU law in the direction of continued integration is not certain. Differentiated integration may be the viable alternative. The research question this article therefore seeks to answer is: how far should harmonization go in the EU? In answering this question, the adoption of a case study methodology allows for generalizing from a specific example to the wider EU trajectory. Tax embodies the tensions between Member State sovereignty and EU law harmonizing agendas, and in the context of the imperative to harmonize caused by the digitization of the economy, it is a microcosm. The tax microcosm demonstrates that there are limits to how far harmonization can go in the EU, and that the future will likely see more differentiated integration.","PeriodicalId":191513,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Macroeconomics & Monetary Economics eJournal","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of EU Differentiated Integration: The Tax Microcosm\",\"authors\":\"Maria Kendrick\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3659322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The EU’s path of integration sees it adopt harmonizing agendas in many areas of EU law. As they touch on areas of Member State sovereignty, these agendas are proving difficult to achieve, either without significant reform, or at all. As a consequence, the future development of EU law in the direction of continued integration is not certain. Differentiated integration may be the viable alternative. The research question this article therefore seeks to answer is: how far should harmonization go in the EU? In answering this question, the adoption of a case study methodology allows for generalizing from a specific example to the wider EU trajectory. Tax embodies the tensions between Member State sovereignty and EU law harmonizing agendas, and in the context of the imperative to harmonize caused by the digitization of the economy, it is a microcosm. The tax microcosm demonstrates that there are limits to how far harmonization can go in the EU, and that the future will likely see more differentiated integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economics: Macroeconomics & Monetary Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economics: Macroeconomics & Monetary Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3659322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Macroeconomics & Monetary Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3659322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧盟一体化的道路上,它在欧盟法律的许多领域采用了协调的议程。由于这些议程涉及会员国主权领域,事实证明,要么不进行重大改革,要么根本就难以实现。因此,欧盟法律在继续一体化方向上的未来发展是不确定的。差异化集成可能是可行的替代方案。因此,本文试图回答的研究问题是:欧盟的协调应该走多远?在回答这个问题时,采用案例研究方法可以从一个具体的例子推广到更广泛的欧盟轨迹。税收体现了成员国主权与欧盟法律协调议程之间的紧张关系,在经济数字化导致的协调势在必行的背景下,它是一个缩影。税收微观世界表明,欧盟的协调程度是有限的,未来可能会看到更多的差异化整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Future of EU Differentiated Integration: The Tax Microcosm
The EU’s path of integration sees it adopt harmonizing agendas in many areas of EU law. As they touch on areas of Member State sovereignty, these agendas are proving difficult to achieve, either without significant reform, or at all. As a consequence, the future development of EU law in the direction of continued integration is not certain. Differentiated integration may be the viable alternative. The research question this article therefore seeks to answer is: how far should harmonization go in the EU? In answering this question, the adoption of a case study methodology allows for generalizing from a specific example to the wider EU trajectory. Tax embodies the tensions between Member State sovereignty and EU law harmonizing agendas, and in the context of the imperative to harmonize caused by the digitization of the economy, it is a microcosm. The tax microcosm demonstrates that there are limits to how far harmonization can go in the EU, and that the future will likely see more differentiated integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信