“我不能呼吸了”

A. Reading
{"title":"“我不能呼吸了”","authors":"A. Reading","doi":"10.4324/9781003089872-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter takes as its starting point the #Black Lives Matter slogan ‘I can’t breathe’ cycling through intersectional mediations and mobilisation to develop an emergent analytical framework for immobile antisocialities. It draws on multi-disciplinary approaches beyond media studies to create a conceptual framework that gives air to elements that are immobile and antisocial. The chapter asks, how do we understand the experience of interruption and amplified displacement arising from locative, temporal and social breakage experienced during stoppages of movement which we might conceptualise as immobile socialities? How do we understand what happens to sociality when movement and close contact between people is regulated and curtailed as in the 2020 COVID 19 lockdowns, as result of protests and blockades or as a result of police or security checkpoints? Two main ideas are suggested: the idea of a ‘respiratory ontology’ to suggest how mobility and immobility, sociality and antisociality give life to each other, and secondly, as part of this, the idea of radical antisociality. © 2021 selection and editorial matter, Annette Hill, Maren Hartmann and Magnus Andersson.","PeriodicalId":360225,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities","volume":"89 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘I can’t Breathe’\",\"authors\":\"A. Reading\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003089872-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter takes as its starting point the #Black Lives Matter slogan ‘I can’t breathe’ cycling through intersectional mediations and mobilisation to develop an emergent analytical framework for immobile antisocialities. It draws on multi-disciplinary approaches beyond media studies to create a conceptual framework that gives air to elements that are immobile and antisocial. The chapter asks, how do we understand the experience of interruption and amplified displacement arising from locative, temporal and social breakage experienced during stoppages of movement which we might conceptualise as immobile socialities? How do we understand what happens to sociality when movement and close contact between people is regulated and curtailed as in the 2020 COVID 19 lockdowns, as result of protests and blockades or as a result of police or security checkpoints? Two main ideas are suggested: the idea of a ‘respiratory ontology’ to suggest how mobility and immobility, sociality and antisociality give life to each other, and secondly, as part of this, the idea of radical antisociality. © 2021 selection and editorial matter, Annette Hill, Maren Hartmann and Magnus Andersson.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities\",\"volume\":\"89 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003089872-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003089872-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章以#黑人的命也重要#的口号“我无法呼吸”为起点,通过交叉调解和动员来发展一个针对固定反社会的新兴分析框架。它借鉴了媒体研究之外的多学科方法,创造了一个概念框架,为固定和反社会的元素提供了空间。本章提出的问题是,我们如何理解在我们可能概念化为固定社会的运动停止期间,由位置、时间和社会断裂所经历的中断和放大位移的经验?当人们之间的流动和密切接触受到管制和限制时,我们如何理解社会会发生什么,就像2020年COVID - 19封锁那样,由于抗议和封锁,或者由于警察或安全检查站?他提出了两个主要观点:一是“呼吸本体论”的观点,它表明了流动性和不流动性,社会性和反社会性是如何相互赋予生命的,第二,作为其中的一部分,激进反社会性的观点。©2021选择和编辑事项,安妮特·希尔,马伦·哈特曼和马格努斯·安德森。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘I can’t Breathe’
This chapter takes as its starting point the #Black Lives Matter slogan ‘I can’t breathe’ cycling through intersectional mediations and mobilisation to develop an emergent analytical framework for immobile antisocialities. It draws on multi-disciplinary approaches beyond media studies to create a conceptual framework that gives air to elements that are immobile and antisocial. The chapter asks, how do we understand the experience of interruption and amplified displacement arising from locative, temporal and social breakage experienced during stoppages of movement which we might conceptualise as immobile socialities? How do we understand what happens to sociality when movement and close contact between people is regulated and curtailed as in the 2020 COVID 19 lockdowns, as result of protests and blockades or as a result of police or security checkpoints? Two main ideas are suggested: the idea of a ‘respiratory ontology’ to suggest how mobility and immobility, sociality and antisociality give life to each other, and secondly, as part of this, the idea of radical antisociality. © 2021 selection and editorial matter, Annette Hill, Maren Hartmann and Magnus Andersson.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信