{"title":"k集一致的紧下界","authors":"S. Chaudhuri, M. Herlihy, N. Lynch, M. Tuttle","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.1993.366866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a synchronous, message-passing model where processors fail by crashing. We prove a lower bound of [f/k]+1 rounds of communication for solutions to k-set agreement that tolerate f failures. This bound is tight, and shows that there is an inherent tradeoff between the running time, the degree of coordination required, and the number of faults tolerated, even in idealized models like the synchronous model. The proof of this result is interesting because it is a geometric combination of other well-known proof techniques.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":253303,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A tight lower bound for k-set agreement\",\"authors\":\"S. Chaudhuri, M. Herlihy, N. Lynch, M. Tuttle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SFCS.1993.366866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a synchronous, message-passing model where processors fail by crashing. We prove a lower bound of [f/k]+1 rounds of communication for solutions to k-set agreement that tolerate f failures. This bound is tight, and shows that there is an inherent tradeoff between the running time, the degree of coordination required, and the number of faults tolerated, even in idealized models like the synchronous model. The proof of this result is interesting because it is a geometric combination of other well-known proof techniques.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1993.366866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1993.366866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a synchronous, message-passing model where processors fail by crashing. We prove a lower bound of [f/k]+1 rounds of communication for solutions to k-set agreement that tolerate f failures. This bound is tight, and shows that there is an inherent tradeoff between the running time, the degree of coordination required, and the number of faults tolerated, even in idealized models like the synchronous model. The proof of this result is interesting because it is a geometric combination of other well-known proof techniques.<>