k集一致的紧下界

S. Chaudhuri, M. Herlihy, N. Lynch, M. Tuttle
{"title":"k集一致的紧下界","authors":"S. Chaudhuri, M. Herlihy, N. Lynch, M. Tuttle","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.1993.366866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a synchronous, message-passing model where processors fail by crashing. We prove a lower bound of [f/k]+1 rounds of communication for solutions to k-set agreement that tolerate f failures. This bound is tight, and shows that there is an inherent tradeoff between the running time, the degree of coordination required, and the number of faults tolerated, even in idealized models like the synchronous model. The proof of this result is interesting because it is a geometric combination of other well-known proof techniques.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":253303,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A tight lower bound for k-set agreement\",\"authors\":\"S. Chaudhuri, M. Herlihy, N. Lynch, M. Tuttle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SFCS.1993.366866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a synchronous, message-passing model where processors fail by crashing. We prove a lower bound of [f/k]+1 rounds of communication for solutions to k-set agreement that tolerate f failures. This bound is tight, and shows that there is an inherent tradeoff between the running time, the degree of coordination required, and the number of faults tolerated, even in idealized models like the synchronous model. The proof of this result is interesting because it is a geometric combination of other well-known proof techniques.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1993.366866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1993.366866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

我们证明了解决k集协议所需时间的紧界,这是共识的自然推广。我们在一个同步的消息传递模型中分析这个问题,其中处理器因崩溃而失败。我们证明了容忍f次失败的k集协议解的[f/k]+1轮通信的下界。这个界限很紧,并且表明在运行时间、所需的协调程度和可容忍的错误数量之间存在固有的权衡,即使在同步模型这样的理想化模型中也是如此。这个结果的证明很有趣,因为它是其他著名证明技术的几何组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A tight lower bound for k-set agreement
We prove tight bounds on the time needed to solve k-set agreement, a natural generalization of consensus. We analyze this problem in a synchronous, message-passing model where processors fail by crashing. We prove a lower bound of [f/k]+1 rounds of communication for solutions to k-set agreement that tolerate f failures. This bound is tight, and shows that there is an inherent tradeoff between the running time, the degree of coordination required, and the number of faults tolerated, even in idealized models like the synchronous model. The proof of this result is interesting because it is a geometric combination of other well-known proof techniques.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信