{"title":"特设IR:没有太多的改进空间","authors":"A. Trotman, David Keeler","doi":"10.1145/2009916.2010066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ranking function performance reached a plateau in 1994. The reason for this is investigated. First the performance of BM25 is measured as the proportion of queries satisfied on the first page of 10 results -- it performs well. The performance is then compared to human performance. They perform comparably. The conclusion is there isn't much room for ranking function improvement.","PeriodicalId":356580,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ad hoc IR: not much room for improvement\",\"authors\":\"A. Trotman, David Keeler\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2009916.2010066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ranking function performance reached a plateau in 1994. The reason for this is investigated. First the performance of BM25 is measured as the proportion of queries satisfied on the first page of 10 results -- it performs well. The performance is then compared to human performance. They perform comparably. The conclusion is there isn't much room for ranking function improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2009916.2010066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2009916.2010066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ranking function performance reached a plateau in 1994. The reason for this is investigated. First the performance of BM25 is measured as the proportion of queries satisfied on the first page of 10 results -- it performs well. The performance is then compared to human performance. They perform comparably. The conclusion is there isn't much room for ranking function improvement.