在性别平等和可持续发展政策领域之间建立联系,为双方寻找附加值

Hannah Birkenkötter, Gabriele Köhler, Anke Stock
{"title":"在性别平等和可持续发展政策领域之间建立联系,为双方寻找附加值","authors":"Hannah Birkenkötter, Gabriele Köhler, Anke Stock","doi":"10.18356/32CB2845-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preceding section presented evidence that a range of factors accounts for the lack of traction of the 2030 Agenda’s gender equality commitments in the German domestic discourse. The problem is both substantive and institutional: the current sustainability architecture, as sophisticated as it may look on paper, does not succeed in creating coherence within the Government, and thus has no meaningful impact on domestic policy thinking with regard to sustainability overall, and gender and sustainability in particular. Germany’s 2030 Agenda commitment thus largely comes across as a rhetorical exercise when looking at its domestic policy impact – which, after all, is the major paradigm shift offered by the 2030 Agenda. Domestic social and gender equality policy does not appear to be influenced by the 2030 Agenda, despite the German Sustainable Development Strategy and its sophisticated institutional architecture. As one interviewee, working on SDG implementation at the local level, commented: “Germany likes to hide behind its beautiful architecture”.","PeriodicalId":224746,"journal":{"name":"UN Women Discussion Papers","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating interfaces between the gender equality and sustainability policy fields — finding added value for both sides\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Birkenkötter, Gabriele Köhler, Anke Stock\",\"doi\":\"10.18356/32CB2845-EN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The preceding section presented evidence that a range of factors accounts for the lack of traction of the 2030 Agenda’s gender equality commitments in the German domestic discourse. The problem is both substantive and institutional: the current sustainability architecture, as sophisticated as it may look on paper, does not succeed in creating coherence within the Government, and thus has no meaningful impact on domestic policy thinking with regard to sustainability overall, and gender and sustainability in particular. Germany’s 2030 Agenda commitment thus largely comes across as a rhetorical exercise when looking at its domestic policy impact – which, after all, is the major paradigm shift offered by the 2030 Agenda. Domestic social and gender equality policy does not appear to be influenced by the 2030 Agenda, despite the German Sustainable Development Strategy and its sophisticated institutional architecture. As one interviewee, working on SDG implementation at the local level, commented: “Germany likes to hide behind its beautiful architecture”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UN Women Discussion Papers\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UN Women Discussion Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18356/32CB2845-EN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UN Women Discussion Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18356/32CB2845-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前一节提供的证据表明,一系列因素导致了2030年议程性别平等承诺在德国国内话语中缺乏吸引力。这个问题既是实质性的,也是体制性的:目前的可持续性结构虽然在纸面上看起来很复杂,但未能成功地在政府内部建立一致性,因此对有关整体可持续性,特别是性别和可持续性的国内政策思想没有任何有意义的影响。因此,在审视其国内政策影响时,德国的2030年议程承诺在很大程度上被视为一种修辞练习——毕竟,这是2030年议程提供的主要范式转变。国内社会和性别平等政策似乎没有受到《2030年议程》的影响,尽管有《德国可持续发展战略》及其复杂的体制架构。正如一位在地方层面从事可持续发展目标实施工作的受访者所评论的那样:“德国喜欢躲在美丽的建筑后面”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creating interfaces between the gender equality and sustainability policy fields — finding added value for both sides
The preceding section presented evidence that a range of factors accounts for the lack of traction of the 2030 Agenda’s gender equality commitments in the German domestic discourse. The problem is both substantive and institutional: the current sustainability architecture, as sophisticated as it may look on paper, does not succeed in creating coherence within the Government, and thus has no meaningful impact on domestic policy thinking with regard to sustainability overall, and gender and sustainability in particular. Germany’s 2030 Agenda commitment thus largely comes across as a rhetorical exercise when looking at its domestic policy impact – which, after all, is the major paradigm shift offered by the 2030 Agenda. Domestic social and gender equality policy does not appear to be influenced by the 2030 Agenda, despite the German Sustainable Development Strategy and its sophisticated institutional architecture. As one interviewee, working on SDG implementation at the local level, commented: “Germany likes to hide behind its beautiful architecture”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信