{"title":"微观批判与崇高","authors":"James Williams","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439114.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter sets out the method for analysing the sublime: microcritique. The method is inspired by microhistory and the work of Carlo Ginzburg, in particular. The chapter presents the problem of exclusion, whereby methods lead to exclusions of evidence and of different ways of life. To mitigate this problem, it defends a fragmentary and open methodology inspired by large frame and close-up takes, inspired by cinema and the work of Siegfried Kracauer.","PeriodicalId":328301,"journal":{"name":"The Egalitarian Sublime","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microcritique and the Sublime\",\"authors\":\"James Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439114.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter sets out the method for analysing the sublime: microcritique. The method is inspired by microhistory and the work of Carlo Ginzburg, in particular. The chapter presents the problem of exclusion, whereby methods lead to exclusions of evidence and of different ways of life. To mitigate this problem, it defends a fragmentary and open methodology inspired by large frame and close-up takes, inspired by cinema and the work of Siegfried Kracauer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egalitarian Sublime\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egalitarian Sublime\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439114.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egalitarian Sublime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439114.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter sets out the method for analysing the sublime: microcritique. The method is inspired by microhistory and the work of Carlo Ginzburg, in particular. The chapter presents the problem of exclusion, whereby methods lead to exclusions of evidence and of different ways of life. To mitigate this problem, it defends a fragmentary and open methodology inspired by large frame and close-up takes, inspired by cinema and the work of Siegfried Kracauer.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
