遗留银行系统的重新记录:经验报告

J. Geet, Peter Ebraert, S. Demeyer
{"title":"遗留银行系统的重新记录:经验报告","authors":"J. Geet, Peter Ebraert, S. Demeyer","doi":"10.1145/1862372.1862382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful software systems need to be maintained. In order to do that, deep knowledge about their architecture and implementation details is required. This knowledge is often kept implicit (inside the heads of the experts) and sometimes made explicit in documentation. The problem is that systems often lack up-to-date documentation and that system experts are frequently unavailable (as they got another job or retired). Redocumentation addresses that problem by recovering knowledge about the system and making it explicit in documentation. Automating the redocumentation process can limit the tedious and error-prone manual effort, but it is no 'silver bullet'. In this paper, we report on our experience with applying redocumentation techniques in industry. We provide insights on what (not) to document, what (not) to automate and how to automate it. A concrete lesson learned during this study is that the \"less is more\" principle also applies to redocumentation.","PeriodicalId":443035,"journal":{"name":"IWPSE-EVOL '10","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redocumentation of a legacy banking system: an experience report\",\"authors\":\"J. Geet, Peter Ebraert, S. Demeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1862372.1862382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Successful software systems need to be maintained. In order to do that, deep knowledge about their architecture and implementation details is required. This knowledge is often kept implicit (inside the heads of the experts) and sometimes made explicit in documentation. The problem is that systems often lack up-to-date documentation and that system experts are frequently unavailable (as they got another job or retired). Redocumentation addresses that problem by recovering knowledge about the system and making it explicit in documentation. Automating the redocumentation process can limit the tedious and error-prone manual effort, but it is no 'silver bullet'. In this paper, we report on our experience with applying redocumentation techniques in industry. We provide insights on what (not) to document, what (not) to automate and how to automate it. A concrete lesson learned during this study is that the \\\"less is more\\\" principle also applies to redocumentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IWPSE-EVOL '10\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IWPSE-EVOL '10\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1862372.1862382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IWPSE-EVOL '10","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1862372.1862382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

成功的软件系统需要维护。为了做到这一点,需要深入了解它们的体系结构和实现细节。这些知识通常是隐式的(在专家的头脑中),有时在文档中是明确的。问题是系统经常缺乏最新的文档,并且系统专家经常是不可用的(因为他们找到了另一份工作或退休了)。重新编制文档通过恢复关于系统的知识并使其在文档中显化来解决这个问题。自动化重新编制文档的过程可以限制繁琐和容易出错的手工工作,但它不是“银弹”。在本文中,我们报告了我们在工业中应用重新记录技术的经验。我们提供了关于什么(不)需要编制文档、什么(不)需要自动化以及如何自动化的见解。从这项研究中得到的一个具体教训是,“少即是多”的原则也适用于重新记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redocumentation of a legacy banking system: an experience report
Successful software systems need to be maintained. In order to do that, deep knowledge about their architecture and implementation details is required. This knowledge is often kept implicit (inside the heads of the experts) and sometimes made explicit in documentation. The problem is that systems often lack up-to-date documentation and that system experts are frequently unavailable (as they got another job or retired). Redocumentation addresses that problem by recovering knowledge about the system and making it explicit in documentation. Automating the redocumentation process can limit the tedious and error-prone manual effort, but it is no 'silver bullet'. In this paper, we report on our experience with applying redocumentation techniques in industry. We provide insights on what (not) to document, what (not) to automate and how to automate it. A concrete lesson learned during this study is that the "less is more" principle also applies to redocumentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信