{"title":"PENERAPAN MEREK TERDAFTAR TIDAK DIGUNAKAN (NON-USE MARKS) ANALISIS KASUS ANTARA INTER IKEA SYSTEM BV DAN PT RATANIA KHATULISTIWA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015","authors":"S. Handoyo, Suyud Margono","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of business competition in the world of trade, making protection of intellectual property rights very important. Especially in the field of brands. Brand is an important thing to use to differentiate between one another by having a certain characteristic. In this paper we will discuss the case of the \"IKEA\" brand elimination dispute between Inter Ikea System BV and PT Ratania Khatulistiwa, where the lawsuit was filed because of the Inter Ikea System BV that have the \"IKEA\" brand which has not been used for 3 consecutive years. The case will be analyzed by Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning the provisions regarding the elimination of the mark and regarding the good faith of the trademark registration of application. By examining the case we can find out the proper legal application and dispute resolution in accordance with the case so that it can provide justice for the parties. In accordance with the five precepts of Pancasila, namely \"Justice for all Indonesian people\".","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"1 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
世界贸易中商业竞争的发展，使得知识产权的保护变得非常重要。尤其是在品牌领域。品牌是一种重要的东西，通过具有某种特征来区分彼此。在本文中，我们将讨论Inter IKEA System BV与PT Ratania Khatulistiwa之间的“IKEA”品牌淘汰纠纷，该诉讼是由于Inter IKEA System BV拥有连续3年未使用的“IKEA”品牌而提起的。本案将根据2001年第15号法律对商标的消除和商标注册申请的诚信条款进行分析。通过对案件的审查，我们可以找到适合案件的法律适用和争议解决方法，从而为当事人伸张正义。根据潘卡西拉的五戒，即“为全体印尼人民伸张正义”。
PENERAPAN MEREK TERDAFTAR TIDAK DIGUNAKAN (NON-USE MARKS) ANALISIS KASUS ANTARA INTER IKEA SYSTEM BV DAN PT RATANIA KHATULISTIWA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015
The development of business competition in the world of trade, making protection of intellectual property rights very important. Especially in the field of brands. Brand is an important thing to use to differentiate between one another by having a certain characteristic. In this paper we will discuss the case of the "IKEA" brand elimination dispute between Inter Ikea System BV and PT Ratania Khatulistiwa, where the lawsuit was filed because of the Inter Ikea System BV that have the "IKEA" brand which has not been used for 3 consecutive years. The case will be analyzed by Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning the provisions regarding the elimination of the mark and regarding the good faith of the trademark registration of application. By examining the case we can find out the proper legal application and dispute resolution in accordance with the case so that it can provide justice for the parties. In accordance with the five precepts of Pancasila, namely "Justice for all Indonesian people".
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
