辐射发射试验装置的分析与实验比较

C. Vitek, E. Blankenship
{"title":"辐射发射试验装置的分析与实验比较","authors":"C. Vitek, E. Blankenship","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.1999.812904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiated emissions measurements are usually required to be performed on a facility that meets the normalized site attenuation (NSA) and receive antenna scan height requirements of ANSI C63.4 and CISPR 22. However, often preliminary measurements for the purpose of frequency identification or engineering and troubleshooting are performed at fixed scan height indoor semi-anechoic facilities or free space facilities. Free Space facilities, in particular, have been put forth as a possible future alternative standard to open area test site (OATS) for certification measurements. An analytical and experimental comparison of the relative merits of these different types of facilities is presented.","PeriodicalId":312828,"journal":{"name":"1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatability. Symposium Record (Cat. No.99CH36261)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analytical and experimental comparison of radiated emissions test facilities\",\"authors\":\"C. Vitek, E. Blankenship\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEMC.1999.812904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Radiated emissions measurements are usually required to be performed on a facility that meets the normalized site attenuation (NSA) and receive antenna scan height requirements of ANSI C63.4 and CISPR 22. However, often preliminary measurements for the purpose of frequency identification or engineering and troubleshooting are performed at fixed scan height indoor semi-anechoic facilities or free space facilities. Free Space facilities, in particular, have been put forth as a possible future alternative standard to open area test site (OATS) for certification measurements. An analytical and experimental comparison of the relative merits of these different types of facilities is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatability. Symposium Record (Cat. No.99CH36261)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatability. Symposium Record (Cat. No.99CH36261)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1999.812904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatability. Symposium Record (Cat. No.99CH36261)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1999.812904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

辐射发射测量通常需要在满足标准化站点衰减(NSA)和ANSI C63.4和CISPR 22的接收天线扫描高度要求的设施上进行。然而,用于频率识别或工程和故障排除的初步测量通常是在固定扫描高度的室内半消声设施或自由空间设施中进行的。特别是自由空间设施,已被提出作为未来可能替代开放区域试验场的认证测量标准。对这些不同类型的设备的相对优点进行了分析和实验比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analytical and experimental comparison of radiated emissions test facilities
Radiated emissions measurements are usually required to be performed on a facility that meets the normalized site attenuation (NSA) and receive antenna scan height requirements of ANSI C63.4 and CISPR 22. However, often preliminary measurements for the purpose of frequency identification or engineering and troubleshooting are performed at fixed scan height indoor semi-anechoic facilities or free space facilities. Free Space facilities, in particular, have been put forth as a possible future alternative standard to open area test site (OATS) for certification measurements. An analytical and experimental comparison of the relative merits of these different types of facilities is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信