核反应堆建筑楼板响应的认知不确定性量化

Byunghyun Choi, A. Nishida, Yinsheng Li, K. Muramatsu, T. Takada
{"title":"核反应堆建筑楼板响应的认知不确定性量化","authors":"Byunghyun Choi, A. Nishida, Yinsheng Li, K. Muramatsu, T. Takada","doi":"10.1115/ICONE26-82034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the 2011 Fukushima accident, engineers of nuclear power plants are looking beyond the basic design requirements and ensuring that countermeasures are built in to avert possible nuclear accidents. In seismic probabilistic risk assessment (SPRA), uncertainties can be classified in two ways as aleatory uncertainties or epistemic uncertainties. To improve the reliability of SPRA, the difference in seismic response due to difference of building modelings related to epistemic uncertainty was focused on. Two modeling methods were used for a seismic response analysis: a three-dimensional finite-element model and a conventional sway-rocking stick model. Simulated input ground motions related to aleatory uncertainty were generated for the input waves. Then, the seismic floor response results of the various input ground motions of the two modeling methods were quantified. For the uncertainty quantification related to the different building modelings, a statistical analysis of the floor response results of the nuclear reactor building were further performed. Finally, for the quantification of the uncertainty in the fragility analysis for SPRA, the way to use of these results were discussed.","PeriodicalId":237355,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Plant Systems, Structures, Components, and Materials; Risk Assessments and Management","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification of Floor Responses for a Nuclear Reactor Building\",\"authors\":\"Byunghyun Choi, A. Nishida, Yinsheng Li, K. Muramatsu, T. Takada\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/ICONE26-82034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the 2011 Fukushima accident, engineers of nuclear power plants are looking beyond the basic design requirements and ensuring that countermeasures are built in to avert possible nuclear accidents. In seismic probabilistic risk assessment (SPRA), uncertainties can be classified in two ways as aleatory uncertainties or epistemic uncertainties. To improve the reliability of SPRA, the difference in seismic response due to difference of building modelings related to epistemic uncertainty was focused on. Two modeling methods were used for a seismic response analysis: a three-dimensional finite-element model and a conventional sway-rocking stick model. Simulated input ground motions related to aleatory uncertainty were generated for the input waves. Then, the seismic floor response results of the various input ground motions of the two modeling methods were quantified. For the uncertainty quantification related to the different building modelings, a statistical analysis of the floor response results of the nuclear reactor building were further performed. Finally, for the quantification of the uncertainty in the fragility analysis for SPRA, the way to use of these results were discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2: Plant Systems, Structures, Components, and Materials; Risk Assessments and Management\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2: Plant Systems, Structures, Components, and Materials; Risk Assessments and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE26-82034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Plant Systems, Structures, Components, and Materials; Risk Assessments and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE26-82034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2011年福岛核事故发生后,核电站的工程师们正在超越基本的设计要求,确保建立应对措施,以避免可能发生的核事故。在地震概率风险评估(SPRA)中,不确定性可分为选择性不确定性和认知性不确定性。为了提高SPRA的可靠性,重点研究了与认知不确定性相关的不同建筑建模导致的地震反应差异。地震反应分析采用了三维有限元模型和传统的摇摆杆模型两种建模方法。对输入波产生了与测量不确定性相关的模拟输入地震动。然后,对两种建模方法的各种输入地震动的地震反应结果进行了量化。针对不同建筑模型的不确定性量化,进一步对核反应堆建筑的楼板响应结果进行了统计分析。最后,针对SPRA脆弱性分析中不确定性的量化,讨论了利用这些结果的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification of Floor Responses for a Nuclear Reactor Building
After the 2011 Fukushima accident, engineers of nuclear power plants are looking beyond the basic design requirements and ensuring that countermeasures are built in to avert possible nuclear accidents. In seismic probabilistic risk assessment (SPRA), uncertainties can be classified in two ways as aleatory uncertainties or epistemic uncertainties. To improve the reliability of SPRA, the difference in seismic response due to difference of building modelings related to epistemic uncertainty was focused on. Two modeling methods were used for a seismic response analysis: a three-dimensional finite-element model and a conventional sway-rocking stick model. Simulated input ground motions related to aleatory uncertainty were generated for the input waves. Then, the seismic floor response results of the various input ground motions of the two modeling methods were quantified. For the uncertainty quantification related to the different building modelings, a statistical analysis of the floor response results of the nuclear reactor building were further performed. Finally, for the quantification of the uncertainty in the fragility analysis for SPRA, the way to use of these results were discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信