数字技术与民事诉讼:相互影响问题

K. Branovitskii, I. Renz, A. Neznamov, A. Neznamov, V. Yarkov
{"title":"数字技术与民事诉讼:相互影响问题","authors":"K. Branovitskii, I. Renz, A. Neznamov, A. Neznamov, V. Yarkov","doi":"10.34076/2619-0672-2018-2-56-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the comprehensive impact of digital technologies on the modern civil process is obvious. Today, digital technologies have become a reality not only of judicial process, but also of enforcement proceedings, as well as notaries and arbitration. At the same time, the massive introduction of digital technologies has posed a number of conceptual issues: for example, the permissible limits of the impact of such technologies on the very essence of civil law enforcement. In spite of the fact that there are a number of rather fundamental studies in Russian and foreign science, this problem is not sufficiently covered in science and has not yet found a solution.\n\nMethods: the method of materialistic dialectics; the system method; the method of comparative law.\n\nAnalysis: due to analysis of the achieved level of practical development and doctrinal understanding of digital technologies in the Russian and foreign civil process, an attempt is made to conduct a theoretical and practical study of the problem of interinfluence of digital technologies and the civil process.\n\nResults: a) the dominant approach to the understanding of digital technologies at the doctrinal and regulatory level is the «instrumental approach», in which such technologies are perceived primarily as new ways of conducting law enforcement activities, conceptually not changing the very foundations of such activities, b) as a way (form) of implementation of law enforcement activities, digital technologies can not affect the content of this activity; the massive or radical introduction of such technologies could influence not only certain institutions of civil procedural law, but also its principles, topology, the very essence of law enforcement in civil cases.","PeriodicalId":215513,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: PROBLEMS OF INTERINFLUENCE\",\"authors\":\"K. Branovitskii, I. Renz, A. Neznamov, A. Neznamov, V. Yarkov\",\"doi\":\"10.34076/2619-0672-2018-2-56-68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: the comprehensive impact of digital technologies on the modern civil process is obvious. Today, digital technologies have become a reality not only of judicial process, but also of enforcement proceedings, as well as notaries and arbitration. At the same time, the massive introduction of digital technologies has posed a number of conceptual issues: for example, the permissible limits of the impact of such technologies on the very essence of civil law enforcement. In spite of the fact that there are a number of rather fundamental studies in Russian and foreign science, this problem is not sufficiently covered in science and has not yet found a solution.\\n\\nMethods: the method of materialistic dialectics; the system method; the method of comparative law.\\n\\nAnalysis: due to analysis of the achieved level of practical development and doctrinal understanding of digital technologies in the Russian and foreign civil process, an attempt is made to conduct a theoretical and practical study of the problem of interinfluence of digital technologies and the civil process.\\n\\nResults: a) the dominant approach to the understanding of digital technologies at the doctrinal and regulatory level is the «instrumental approach», in which such technologies are perceived primarily as new ways of conducting law enforcement activities, conceptually not changing the very foundations of such activities, b) as a way (form) of implementation of law enforcement activities, digital technologies can not affect the content of this activity; the massive or radical introduction of such technologies could influence not only certain institutions of civil procedural law, but also its principles, topology, the very essence of law enforcement in civil cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34076/2619-0672-2018-2-56-68\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34076/2619-0672-2018-2-56-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言:数字技术对现代民事程序的全面影响是显而易见的。今天,数字技术不仅成为司法程序的现实,而且成为执行程序、公证和仲裁的现实。与此同时,数字技术的大量采用也带来了一些概念性问题:例如,这些技术对民事执法的本质影响的可允许限度。尽管在俄罗斯和国外的科学领域有许多相当基础的研究,但这个问题在科学中没有得到充分的研究,也没有找到解决办法。方法:唯物辩证法;系统方法;比较法比较法的方法分析:由于对俄罗斯和外国民事程序中数字技术的实践发展水平和理论理解的分析,试图对数字技术与民事程序的相互影响问题进行理论和实践研究。结果:a)在理论和监管层面理解数字技术的主要方法是“工具方法”,其中此类技术主要被视为开展执法活动的新方式,在概念上不会改变此类活动的基础;b)作为实施执法活动的方式(形式),数字技术不会影响该活动的内容;大规模或激进地采用这种技术不仅会影响民事诉讼法的某些机构,而且会影响其原则、结构和民事案件执法的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: PROBLEMS OF INTERINFLUENCE
Introduction: the comprehensive impact of digital technologies on the modern civil process is obvious. Today, digital technologies have become a reality not only of judicial process, but also of enforcement proceedings, as well as notaries and arbitration. At the same time, the massive introduction of digital technologies has posed a number of conceptual issues: for example, the permissible limits of the impact of such technologies on the very essence of civil law enforcement. In spite of the fact that there are a number of rather fundamental studies in Russian and foreign science, this problem is not sufficiently covered in science and has not yet found a solution. Methods: the method of materialistic dialectics; the system method; the method of comparative law. Analysis: due to analysis of the achieved level of practical development and doctrinal understanding of digital technologies in the Russian and foreign civil process, an attempt is made to conduct a theoretical and practical study of the problem of interinfluence of digital technologies and the civil process. Results: a) the dominant approach to the understanding of digital technologies at the doctrinal and regulatory level is the «instrumental approach», in which such technologies are perceived primarily as new ways of conducting law enforcement activities, conceptually not changing the very foundations of such activities, b) as a way (form) of implementation of law enforcement activities, digital technologies can not affect the content of this activity; the massive or radical introduction of such technologies could influence not only certain institutions of civil procedural law, but also its principles, topology, the very essence of law enforcement in civil cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信