根据OPCM 3431和欧洲规范8对既有钢筋混凝土框架建筑抗震评估程序的思考与建议

V. Mpampatsikos, L. Petrini, R. Nascimbene
{"title":"根据OPCM 3431和欧洲规范8对既有钢筋混凝土框架建筑抗震评估程序的思考与建议","authors":"V. Mpampatsikos, L. Petrini, R. Nascimbene","doi":"10.3383/ES.2.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the European seismic countries, the majority of the building heritage was designed according to out-of-date or even non-seismic codes. The lack of considerations about the nonlinear response during the design stage leads to relevant uncertainties, regarding the potential development, location and extension of inelastic mechanisms, as well as their ductility capacity. Therefore, the reliability of the force-based assessment procedure obtained performing a linear analysis is in general questionable, due to the difficulties associated to the correct evaluation of the reduction factor of the internal forces. The direct consequence is the considerable gain in complexity of the assessment procedures proposed in the Italian seismic code and in Eurocode 8. Both codes promote the use of the nonlinear analyses and the displacement-based approach to assess the ductile response. In the light of these considerations, this work intends to furnish useful tools to perform a reliable assessment of existing r.c. frame buildings. In particular, four irregular structures, built according to out-of-date codes, were analyzed with the following aims: i) suggesting simplified approaches and improvements for the assessment procedures, concerning the evaluation of both seismic demand and capacity of the structural members; ii) checking the importance of defining properly the effective stiffness in linear analyses; iii) checking if the conditions to accept the results of linear methods proposed in the two codes are appropriate; v) giving a judgment about the reliability of the conventional 2-D pushover analysis.","PeriodicalId":268242,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Semeiotics","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations and Suggestions about the Seismic Assessment Procedures of Existing R.C. Frame Buildings According to OPCM 3431 and Eurocode 8\",\"authors\":\"V. Mpampatsikos, L. Petrini, R. Nascimbene\",\"doi\":\"10.3383/ES.2.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the European seismic countries, the majority of the building heritage was designed according to out-of-date or even non-seismic codes. The lack of considerations about the nonlinear response during the design stage leads to relevant uncertainties, regarding the potential development, location and extension of inelastic mechanisms, as well as their ductility capacity. Therefore, the reliability of the force-based assessment procedure obtained performing a linear analysis is in general questionable, due to the difficulties associated to the correct evaluation of the reduction factor of the internal forces. The direct consequence is the considerable gain in complexity of the assessment procedures proposed in the Italian seismic code and in Eurocode 8. Both codes promote the use of the nonlinear analyses and the displacement-based approach to assess the ductile response. In the light of these considerations, this work intends to furnish useful tools to perform a reliable assessment of existing r.c. frame buildings. In particular, four irregular structures, built according to out-of-date codes, were analyzed with the following aims: i) suggesting simplified approaches and improvements for the assessment procedures, concerning the evaluation of both seismic demand and capacity of the structural members; ii) checking the importance of defining properly the effective stiffness in linear analyses; iii) checking if the conditions to accept the results of linear methods proposed in the two codes are appropriate; v) giving a judgment about the reliability of the conventional 2-D pushover analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Semeiotics\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Semeiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3383/ES.2.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Semeiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3383/ES.2.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在欧洲地震国家,大多数建筑遗产是根据过时的甚至非抗震规范设计的。在设计阶段缺乏对非线性响应的考虑,导致非弹性机构的发展潜力、位置和扩展以及延性能力存在相关的不确定性。因此,执行线性分析获得的基于力的评估程序的可靠性通常是有问题的,因为与正确评估内力的减小系数有关的困难。其直接后果是意大利地震规范和欧洲规范8中提出的评估程序的复杂性大大增加。这两个规范都提倡使用非线性分析和基于位移的方法来评估延性响应。考虑到这些因素,本工作旨在提供有用的工具来对现有钢筋混凝土框架建筑进行可靠的评估。特别地,根据过时的规范,对四个不规则结构进行了分析,目的如下:i)提出了简化的方法和改进的评估程序,包括对结构构件的抗震需求和能力的评估;Ii)检验在线性分析中正确定义有效刚度的重要性;Iii)检查接受两种规范中提出的线性方法结果的条件是否合适;v)对常规二维推覆分析的可靠性进行了判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considerations and Suggestions about the Seismic Assessment Procedures of Existing R.C. Frame Buildings According to OPCM 3431 and Eurocode 8
In the European seismic countries, the majority of the building heritage was designed according to out-of-date or even non-seismic codes. The lack of considerations about the nonlinear response during the design stage leads to relevant uncertainties, regarding the potential development, location and extension of inelastic mechanisms, as well as their ductility capacity. Therefore, the reliability of the force-based assessment procedure obtained performing a linear analysis is in general questionable, due to the difficulties associated to the correct evaluation of the reduction factor of the internal forces. The direct consequence is the considerable gain in complexity of the assessment procedures proposed in the Italian seismic code and in Eurocode 8. Both codes promote the use of the nonlinear analyses and the displacement-based approach to assess the ductile response. In the light of these considerations, this work intends to furnish useful tools to perform a reliable assessment of existing r.c. frame buildings. In particular, four irregular structures, built according to out-of-date codes, were analyzed with the following aims: i) suggesting simplified approaches and improvements for the assessment procedures, concerning the evaluation of both seismic demand and capacity of the structural members; ii) checking the importance of defining properly the effective stiffness in linear analyses; iii) checking if the conditions to accept the results of linear methods proposed in the two codes are appropriate; v) giving a judgment about the reliability of the conventional 2-D pushover analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信