有神论不会产生唯心主义

Philosophia Christi Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.5840/pc20232513

R. Mullins

{"title":"有神论不会产生唯心主义","authors":"R. Mullins","doi":"10.5840/pc20232513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sam Lebens offers an intriguing set of arguments from theism to idealism. In this paper, I shall focus on the argument from perfect rationality to Hassidic Idealism. I will offer a critical analysis of this argument and draw out a series of conflicts between Hassidic Idealism and divine freedom, the divine ideas, and creation ex nihilo.","PeriodicalId":434758,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Christi","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theism Does Not Give Birth to Idealism\",\"authors\":\"R. Mullins\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/pc20232513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sam Lebens offers an intriguing set of arguments from theism to idealism. In this paper, I shall focus on the argument from perfect rationality to Hassidic Idealism. I will offer a critical analysis of this argument and draw out a series of conflicts between Hassidic Idealism and divine freedom, the divine ideas, and creation ex nihilo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophia Christi\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophia Christi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/pc20232513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Christi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/pc20232513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Sam Lebens提供了一系列有趣的论证，从有神论到唯心主义。本文将重点讨论从完美理性到哈西德唯心主义的论证。我将对这一论点进行批判性的分析，并引出一系列冲突，在哈西德理想主义和神圣的自由，神圣的思想，以及无中生有的创造之间。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Theism Does Not Give Birth to Idealism

Sam Lebens offers an intriguing set of arguments from theism to idealism. In this paper, I shall focus on the argument from perfect rationality to Hassidic Idealism. I will offer a critical analysis of this argument and draw out a series of conflicts between Hassidic Idealism and divine freedom, the divine ideas, and creation ex nihilo.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophia Christi

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量