Aswini Kumar, V. Ramanarayanan, D. Harikrishnan, R. Sajeev, Athira Rejithan, Vineetha Karuveettil, Reshma Suresh
{"title":"相机和显示技术对数字阴影评估可靠性的影响","authors":"Aswini Kumar, V. Ramanarayanan, D. Harikrishnan, R. Sajeev, Athira Rejithan, Vineetha Karuveettil, Reshma Suresh","doi":"10.4103/amjm.amjm_26_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: For a successful prosthodontic rehabilitation, accurate and economic shade selection methods are warranted. Shade selection with digital cameras and various commonly used digital displays can be suggested as an alternative to expensive colorimetric instruments and inaccurate visual shade selection. To digitalize prosthetic rehabilitation, standards need to be set on minimum digital specifications required to capture and communicate accurate shade selection. This study aimed to establish a minimum specification required for a digital image, to achieve the most accurate result in prosthodontic shade selection, using digital photography. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 dental professionals with normal color vision. Sixteen shade tabs were randomly selected from two commonly used shade guides and were photographed using four different commonly used digital cameras under standardized settings. After dividing the shade tabs into four groups randomly, the images were displayed on four different outputs. Participants were made to match the outputs to a complete set of shade guide. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the proportion of correct responses. Chi-square test was used to test for the presence of statistical association between the groups. Results: For digital shade evaluation, output from the compact camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with an effective output of 14 megapixel showed higher number of responses in terms of accuracy, in comparison with other devices which produced digital outputs with a higher pixel density. The shades were identified best on outputs with a higher pixel density of 2560 × 1600-pixel resolution, followed by full HD LCD display (1920 × 1080-pixel resolution). Conclusion: This study recommends digital photography using a 14-MP camera as a minimum specification for shade selection. For display outputs, laptops with a screen resolution of at least 1920 × 1080, calibrated in standard red, green, blue color space is recommended for visual shade selection.","PeriodicalId":138060,"journal":{"name":"Amrita Journal of Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of camera and display technology on the reliability of digital shade evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Aswini Kumar, V. Ramanarayanan, D. Harikrishnan, R. Sajeev, Athira Rejithan, Vineetha Karuveettil, Reshma Suresh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/amjm.amjm_26_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: For a successful prosthodontic rehabilitation, accurate and economic shade selection methods are warranted. Shade selection with digital cameras and various commonly used digital displays can be suggested as an alternative to expensive colorimetric instruments and inaccurate visual shade selection. To digitalize prosthetic rehabilitation, standards need to be set on minimum digital specifications required to capture and communicate accurate shade selection. This study aimed to establish a minimum specification required for a digital image, to achieve the most accurate result in prosthodontic shade selection, using digital photography. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 dental professionals with normal color vision. Sixteen shade tabs were randomly selected from two commonly used shade guides and were photographed using four different commonly used digital cameras under standardized settings. After dividing the shade tabs into four groups randomly, the images were displayed on four different outputs. Participants were made to match the outputs to a complete set of shade guide. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the proportion of correct responses. Chi-square test was used to test for the presence of statistical association between the groups. Results: For digital shade evaluation, output from the compact camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with an effective output of 14 megapixel showed higher number of responses in terms of accuracy, in comparison with other devices which produced digital outputs with a higher pixel density. The shades were identified best on outputs with a higher pixel density of 2560 × 1600-pixel resolution, followed by full HD LCD display (1920 × 1080-pixel resolution). Conclusion: This study recommends digital photography using a 14-MP camera as a minimum specification for shade selection. For display outputs, laptops with a screen resolution of at least 1920 × 1080, calibrated in standard red, green, blue color space is recommended for visual shade selection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amrita Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amrita Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/amjm.amjm_26_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amrita Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amjm.amjm_26_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了成功的修复,准确和经济的荫蔽选择方法是必要的。可以建议使用数码相机和各种常用数字显示器来选择阴影,以替代昂贵的比色仪器和不准确的视觉阴影选择。为了实现假肢康复的数字化,需要对捕获和传达准确阴影选择所需的最低数字规格设定标准。本研究旨在建立一个数字图像所需的最低规格,以达到最准确的结果,在义齿阴影的选择,使用数码摄影。材料与方法:对100名色盲正常的牙科专业人员进行横断面研究。从两个常用的阴影指南中随机选择16个阴影标签,并在标准化设置下使用四种不同的常用数码相机拍摄。在将阴影标签随机分成四组后,图像显示在四种不同的输出上。参与者被要求将输出与一套完整的阴影指南相匹配。使用描述性统计来评估正确回答的比例。采用卡方检验检验组间是否存在统计学相关性。结果:对于数字阴影评估,与产生更高像素密度的数字输出的其他设备相比,具有1400万像素有效输出的小型相机(Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan)的输出在准确性方面显示出更高的响应次数。在2560 × 1600像素分辨率的高像素密度输出上,色度识别效果最好,其次是全高清LCD显示(1920 × 1080像素分辨率)。结论:本研究建议使用14万像素的数码相机作为遮光选择的最低规格。对于显示输出,建议使用屏幕分辨率至少为1920 × 1080的笔记本电脑,并在标准红、绿、蓝色彩空间中进行校准,以进行视觉阴影选择。
The effect of camera and display technology on the reliability of digital shade evaluation
Introduction: For a successful prosthodontic rehabilitation, accurate and economic shade selection methods are warranted. Shade selection with digital cameras and various commonly used digital displays can be suggested as an alternative to expensive colorimetric instruments and inaccurate visual shade selection. To digitalize prosthetic rehabilitation, standards need to be set on minimum digital specifications required to capture and communicate accurate shade selection. This study aimed to establish a minimum specification required for a digital image, to achieve the most accurate result in prosthodontic shade selection, using digital photography. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 dental professionals with normal color vision. Sixteen shade tabs were randomly selected from two commonly used shade guides and were photographed using four different commonly used digital cameras under standardized settings. After dividing the shade tabs into four groups randomly, the images were displayed on four different outputs. Participants were made to match the outputs to a complete set of shade guide. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the proportion of correct responses. Chi-square test was used to test for the presence of statistical association between the groups. Results: For digital shade evaluation, output from the compact camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with an effective output of 14 megapixel showed higher number of responses in terms of accuracy, in comparison with other devices which produced digital outputs with a higher pixel density. The shades were identified best on outputs with a higher pixel density of 2560 × 1600-pixel resolution, followed by full HD LCD display (1920 × 1080-pixel resolution). Conclusion: This study recommends digital photography using a 14-MP camera as a minimum specification for shade selection. For display outputs, laptops with a screen resolution of at least 1920 × 1080, calibrated in standard red, green, blue color space is recommended for visual shade selection.