{"title":"基于用法的认知结构语法为什么要避免“多重继承”问题","authors":"Lotte Sommerer","doi":"10.1075/BJL.00056.SOM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This squib revisits the phenomenon of ‘Multiple Inheritance’ (MI) and discusses reasons why many usage-based,\n cognitive construction grammarians seem to be avoiding it when modeling the constructicon and linguistic knowledge. After a brief\n discussion of the concept and some examples from the literature, the paper examines potential reasons for the apparent\n disinterest. Finally, the author points to some open questions regarding MI by discussing a specific example, namely modified NPN\n constructions like day after hellish day or hour after hour of dominoes. It can be argued that\n these strings inherit their characteristic features from several different abstract templates.","PeriodicalId":414884,"journal":{"name":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why we avoid the ‘Multiple Inheritance’ issue in Usage-based Cognitive Construction Grammar\",\"authors\":\"Lotte Sommerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/BJL.00056.SOM\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This squib revisits the phenomenon of ‘Multiple Inheritance’ (MI) and discusses reasons why many usage-based,\\n cognitive construction grammarians seem to be avoiding it when modeling the constructicon and linguistic knowledge. After a brief\\n discussion of the concept and some examples from the literature, the paper examines potential reasons for the apparent\\n disinterest. Finally, the author points to some open questions regarding MI by discussing a specific example, namely modified NPN\\n constructions like day after hellish day or hour after hour of dominoes. It can be argued that\\n these strings inherit their characteristic features from several different abstract templates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.00056.SOM\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.00056.SOM","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why we avoid the ‘Multiple Inheritance’ issue in Usage-based Cognitive Construction Grammar
This squib revisits the phenomenon of ‘Multiple Inheritance’ (MI) and discusses reasons why many usage-based,
cognitive construction grammarians seem to be avoiding it when modeling the constructicon and linguistic knowledge. After a brief
discussion of the concept and some examples from the literature, the paper examines potential reasons for the apparent
disinterest. Finally, the author points to some open questions regarding MI by discussing a specific example, namely modified NPN
constructions like day after hellish day or hour after hour of dominoes. It can be argued that
these strings inherit their characteristic features from several different abstract templates.