定量评估捕获-再捕获模型以控制软件检查

L. Briand, K. Emam, B. Freimut, O. Laitenberger
{"title":"定量评估捕获-再捕获模型以控制软件检查","authors":"L. Briand, K. Emam, B. Freimut, O. Laitenberger","doi":"10.1109/ISSRE.1997.630870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important requirement to control the inspection of software artifacts is to be able to decide, based on objective information, whether inspection can stop or whether it should continue to achieve a suitable level of artifact quality. Several studies in software engineering have considered the use of capture-recapture models to predict the number of remaining defects in an inspected document as a decision criterion about reinspection. However, no study on software engineering artifacts compares the actual number of remaining defects to the one predicted by a capture-recapture model. Simulations have been performed but no definite conclusions can be drawn regarding the degree of accuracy of such models under realistic inspection conditions, and the factors affecting this accuracy. Furthermore, none of these studies performed an exhaustive comparison of existing models. In this study, we focus on traditional inspections and estimate, based on actual inspection data, the degree of accuracy of all relevant, state-of-the-art, capture-recapture models for which statistical estimators exist. We compare the various models' accuracies and look at the impact of the number of inspectors on these accuracies. Results show that model accuracies are strongly affected by the number of inspectors and, therefore, one must consider this factor before using capture-recapture models. When the number of inspectors is below 4, no model is sufficiently accurate and underestimation may be substantial. In addition, some models perform better than others in a large number of conditions and plausible reasons are discussed. Based on our analyses, we recommend using a model taking into account different probabilities of detecting defects and a Jacknife estimator.","PeriodicalId":170184,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings The Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative evaluation of capture-recapture models to control software inspections\",\"authors\":\"L. Briand, K. Emam, B. Freimut, O. Laitenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSRE.1997.630870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An important requirement to control the inspection of software artifacts is to be able to decide, based on objective information, whether inspection can stop or whether it should continue to achieve a suitable level of artifact quality. Several studies in software engineering have considered the use of capture-recapture models to predict the number of remaining defects in an inspected document as a decision criterion about reinspection. However, no study on software engineering artifacts compares the actual number of remaining defects to the one predicted by a capture-recapture model. Simulations have been performed but no definite conclusions can be drawn regarding the degree of accuracy of such models under realistic inspection conditions, and the factors affecting this accuracy. Furthermore, none of these studies performed an exhaustive comparison of existing models. In this study, we focus on traditional inspections and estimate, based on actual inspection data, the degree of accuracy of all relevant, state-of-the-art, capture-recapture models for which statistical estimators exist. We compare the various models' accuracies and look at the impact of the number of inspectors on these accuracies. Results show that model accuracies are strongly affected by the number of inspectors and, therefore, one must consider this factor before using capture-recapture models. When the number of inspectors is below 4, no model is sufficiently accurate and underestimation may be substantial. In addition, some models perform better than others in a large number of conditions and plausible reasons are discussed. Based on our analyses, we recommend using a model taking into account different probabilities of detecting defects and a Jacknife estimator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings The Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings The Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.1997.630870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings The Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.1997.630870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

控制软件工件的检查的一个重要要求是能够根据客观信息决定是否可以停止检查,或者是否应该继续检查以达到工件质量的适当水平。软件工程中的一些研究已经考虑使用捕获-再捕获模型来预测已检查文档中剩余缺陷的数量,并将其作为复检的决策标准。然而,没有关于软件工程工件的研究将剩余缺陷的实际数量与捕获-再捕获模型预测的数量进行比较。已经进行了模拟,但对于这些模型在实际检查条件下的精度程度以及影响这种精度的因素,没有得出明确的结论。此外,这些研究都没有对现有模型进行详尽的比较。在这项研究中,我们关注传统的检查和估计,基于实际的检查数据,所有相关的,最先进的,捕获-再捕获模型的准确性程度,统计估计器存在。我们比较了各种模型的准确性,并研究了检查员数量对这些准确性的影响。结果表明,模型精度受到检查员数量的强烈影响,因此,在使用捕获-再捕获模型之前必须考虑这个因素。当视察员人数低于4人时,没有任何模型是足够准确的,低估可能是实质性的。此外,在大量的条件下,一些模型比其他模型表现得更好,并讨论了合理的原因。根据我们的分析,我们建议使用考虑到检测缺陷的不同概率的模型和Jacknife估计器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative evaluation of capture-recapture models to control software inspections
An important requirement to control the inspection of software artifacts is to be able to decide, based on objective information, whether inspection can stop or whether it should continue to achieve a suitable level of artifact quality. Several studies in software engineering have considered the use of capture-recapture models to predict the number of remaining defects in an inspected document as a decision criterion about reinspection. However, no study on software engineering artifacts compares the actual number of remaining defects to the one predicted by a capture-recapture model. Simulations have been performed but no definite conclusions can be drawn regarding the degree of accuracy of such models under realistic inspection conditions, and the factors affecting this accuracy. Furthermore, none of these studies performed an exhaustive comparison of existing models. In this study, we focus on traditional inspections and estimate, based on actual inspection data, the degree of accuracy of all relevant, state-of-the-art, capture-recapture models for which statistical estimators exist. We compare the various models' accuracies and look at the impact of the number of inspectors on these accuracies. Results show that model accuracies are strongly affected by the number of inspectors and, therefore, one must consider this factor before using capture-recapture models. When the number of inspectors is below 4, no model is sufficiently accurate and underestimation may be substantial. In addition, some models perform better than others in a large number of conditions and plausible reasons are discussed. Based on our analyses, we recommend using a model taking into account different probabilities of detecting defects and a Jacknife estimator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信