基于主观答案评价者的盲人考试申请

Deepali J. Joshi, Ajinkya Kulkarni, Manasi More, Riya Pande, Siddharth Patil, Nikhil Saini
{"title":"基于主观答案评价者的盲人考试申请","authors":"Deepali J. Joshi, Ajinkya Kulkarni, Manasi More, Riya Pande, Siddharth Patil, Nikhil Saini","doi":"10.1109/aimv53313.2021.9670936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present in this paper an examination application for blind students with a subjective answer evaluator. In the present scenario, Blind students need a volunteer to give exams, but we have proposed a solution to that by developing a completely voice-controlled website that also records answers given by the students. This will help increase the number of literates who are visually impaired giving as they can independently give exams. The current way of checking subjective answers is adverse. Whenever a human being evaluates papers, the quality is affected by emotion. In this paper, we are testing four different models for subjective answers evaluation using machine language. These models include Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbours. After testing Random Forest proved to be the best giving 83%accuracy.","PeriodicalId":135318,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision (AIMV)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Examination Application For Blind Students With Subjective Answer Evaluator\",\"authors\":\"Deepali J. Joshi, Ajinkya Kulkarni, Manasi More, Riya Pande, Siddharth Patil, Nikhil Saini\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/aimv53313.2021.9670936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present in this paper an examination application for blind students with a subjective answer evaluator. In the present scenario, Blind students need a volunteer to give exams, but we have proposed a solution to that by developing a completely voice-controlled website that also records answers given by the students. This will help increase the number of literates who are visually impaired giving as they can independently give exams. The current way of checking subjective answers is adverse. Whenever a human being evaluates papers, the quality is affected by emotion. In this paper, we are testing four different models for subjective answers evaluation using machine language. These models include Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbours. After testing Random Forest proved to be the best giving 83%accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision (AIMV)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision (AIMV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/aimv53313.2021.9670936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision (AIMV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/aimv53313.2021.9670936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一种采用主观答案评估器的盲人学生考试应用程序。在目前的情况下,盲人学生需要一个志愿者来进行考试,但我们已经提出了一个解决方案,通过开发一个完全语音控制的网站,也记录学生的答案。这将有助于增加识字的视障人士的数量,因为他们可以独立进行考试。目前检验主观答案的方法是不利的。当一个人评价论文时,其质量会受到情绪的影响。在本文中,我们使用机器语言测试了四种不同的主观答案评估模型。这些模型包括逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林、k近邻。经过测试,随机森林被证明是最好的,准确率为83%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Examination Application For Blind Students With Subjective Answer Evaluator
We present in this paper an examination application for blind students with a subjective answer evaluator. In the present scenario, Blind students need a volunteer to give exams, but we have proposed a solution to that by developing a completely voice-controlled website that also records answers given by the students. This will help increase the number of literates who are visually impaired giving as they can independently give exams. The current way of checking subjective answers is adverse. Whenever a human being evaluates papers, the quality is affected by emotion. In this paper, we are testing four different models for subjective answers evaluation using machine language. These models include Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbours. After testing Random Forest proved to be the best giving 83%accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信