总臭氧含量的卫星和地面测量的比较

D. Ionov, Y. Timofeyev, A. M. Shalamyanskiy
{"title":"总臭氧含量的卫星和地面测量的比较","authors":"D. Ionov, Y. Timofeyev, A. M. Shalamyanskiy","doi":"10.2747/0749-3878.40.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results of international experiments for the validation of measurements of total ozone content (TOC) by the GOME instrument are reviewed and compared with measurements made with independent surface measurements from Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and the M-124 ozonometer. The results of numerous comparisons of on-line GOME TOC data with data from ground-based measurements by the Russian ozone monitoring network during 1996-2000 reveal that the GOME data systematically understate TOC (by 4-9%), also noticeable in comparison with data from simultaneous TOMS measurements.","PeriodicalId":405012,"journal":{"name":"Mapping Sciences and Remote Sensing","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Satellite- and Ground-Based Measurements of Total Ozone Content\",\"authors\":\"D. Ionov, Y. Timofeyev, A. M. Shalamyanskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.2747/0749-3878.40.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Results of international experiments for the validation of measurements of total ozone content (TOC) by the GOME instrument are reviewed and compared with measurements made with independent surface measurements from Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and the M-124 ozonometer. The results of numerous comparisons of on-line GOME TOC data with data from ground-based measurements by the Russian ozone monitoring network during 1996-2000 reveal that the GOME data systematically understate TOC (by 4-9%), also noticeable in comparison with data from simultaneous TOMS measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mapping Sciences and Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mapping Sciences and Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2747/0749-3878.40.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mapping Sciences and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2747/0749-3878.40.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

回顾了验证GOME仪器测量总臭氧含量(TOC)的国际实验结果,并将其与Dobson和Brewer分光光度计以及M-124臭氧计的独立表面测量结果进行了比较。1996-2000年期间,GOME在线TOC数据与俄罗斯臭氧监测网地面测量数据的大量比较结果表明,GOME数据系统地低估了TOC(4-9%),与TOMS同步测量数据相比也很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Satellite- and Ground-Based Measurements of Total Ozone Content
Results of international experiments for the validation of measurements of total ozone content (TOC) by the GOME instrument are reviewed and compared with measurements made with independent surface measurements from Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and the M-124 ozonometer. The results of numerous comparisons of on-line GOME TOC data with data from ground-based measurements by the Russian ozone monitoring network during 1996-2000 reveal that the GOME data systematically understate TOC (by 4-9%), also noticeable in comparison with data from simultaneous TOMS measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信