令人讨厌的本质:亚裔美国人与宪法公民

Leti Volpp
{"title":"令人讨厌的本质:亚裔美国人与宪法公民","authors":"Leti Volpp","doi":"10.15779/Z382S28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the curious juxtaposition of the terms Asian American and American citizenship. While the latter might be thought to easily embrace the former, historically this has not been the case. Recent events suggest that there still exists a contradictory relationship between Asian American racialization and the idea of citizenship. The essay examines four different discourses of citizenship: citizenship as legal status, citizenship as rights, citizenship as political activity, and citizenship as identity/solidarity, and investigates how race fractures the promise of each of these discourses. The racialization of Asian Americans seems especially at odds with two of these discourses. The racialization of Asian Americans as disloyal and politically corrupt contradicts the idea of citizenship as produced through political activity, which might cast skepticism on recent calls for a renaissance of civic republicanism. And Asian Americans are not thought to represent the United States citizenry as a matter of identity. This suggests that citizenship as identity is ontologically separate from citizenship as a legal matter, in other words,access to citizenship in the form of formal legal status or in the form of rights, does not guarantee full citizenship.","PeriodicalId":334951,"journal":{"name":"Asian American Law Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obnoxious to Their Very Nature: Asian Americans and Constitutional Citizenship\",\"authors\":\"Leti Volpp\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z382S28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay examines the curious juxtaposition of the terms Asian American and American citizenship. While the latter might be thought to easily embrace the former, historically this has not been the case. Recent events suggest that there still exists a contradictory relationship between Asian American racialization and the idea of citizenship. The essay examines four different discourses of citizenship: citizenship as legal status, citizenship as rights, citizenship as political activity, and citizenship as identity/solidarity, and investigates how race fractures the promise of each of these discourses. The racialization of Asian Americans seems especially at odds with two of these discourses. The racialization of Asian Americans as disloyal and politically corrupt contradicts the idea of citizenship as produced through political activity, which might cast skepticism on recent calls for a renaissance of civic republicanism. And Asian Americans are not thought to represent the United States citizenry as a matter of identity. This suggests that citizenship as identity is ontologically separate from citizenship as a legal matter, in other words,access to citizenship in the form of formal legal status or in the form of rights, does not guarantee full citizenship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian American Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian American Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z382S28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian American Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z382S28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇文章探讨了亚裔美国人和美国公民这两个术语的奇怪并置。虽然后者可能被认为很容易接受前者,但从历史上看,情况并非如此。最近的事件表明,亚裔美国人的种族化与公民身份之间仍然存在矛盾关系。本文考察了四种不同的公民权话语:作为法律地位的公民权、作为权利的公民权、作为政治活动的公民权和作为身份/团结的公民权,并研究了种族是如何破坏这些话语的承诺的。亚裔美国人的种族化似乎尤其与上述两种说法不一致。将亚裔美国人视为不忠诚和政治腐败的种族化,与通过政治活动产生的公民身份观念相矛盾,这可能会让人对最近呼吁公民共和主义复兴的呼声产生怀疑。亚裔美国人也不被认为是美国公民身份的代表。这表明,作为身份的公民权在本体论上与作为法律问题的公民权是分开的,换句话说,以正式法律地位的形式或以权利的形式获得公民权并不能保证完全的公民权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obnoxious to Their Very Nature: Asian Americans and Constitutional Citizenship
This essay examines the curious juxtaposition of the terms Asian American and American citizenship. While the latter might be thought to easily embrace the former, historically this has not been the case. Recent events suggest that there still exists a contradictory relationship between Asian American racialization and the idea of citizenship. The essay examines four different discourses of citizenship: citizenship as legal status, citizenship as rights, citizenship as political activity, and citizenship as identity/solidarity, and investigates how race fractures the promise of each of these discourses. The racialization of Asian Americans seems especially at odds with two of these discourses. The racialization of Asian Americans as disloyal and politically corrupt contradicts the idea of citizenship as produced through political activity, which might cast skepticism on recent calls for a renaissance of civic republicanism. And Asian Americans are not thought to represent the United States citizenry as a matter of identity. This suggests that citizenship as identity is ontologically separate from citizenship as a legal matter, in other words,access to citizenship in the form of formal legal status or in the form of rights, does not guarantee full citizenship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信