同意不同意:关于标记有用的应用程序评论

Andrew J. Simmons, Leonard Hoon
{"title":"同意不同意:关于标记有用的应用程序评论","authors":"Andrew J. Simmons, Leonard Hoon","doi":"10.1145/3010915.3010976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile apps designers seek to prioritise and refine app features so as to optimise user experience across the ensemble of possible situations and contexts in which the app is used. App reviews---some helpful, others irrelevant---can be analysed for feedback on this user experience. However, few studies have specifically examined the helpfulness of app reviews. In this paper, we surveyed users and developers to rate 167 reviews for helpfulness, obtaining a total of 2,558 helpfulness ratings captured on a 5 point Likert scale. We found only slight agreement (nominal Krippendorff's alpha = 0.039) between participants on the helpfulness of reviews. Differences between reviews become evident when we summarise all the helpfulness ratings per review. We conclude that the disagreement among users limits the potential of mobile app review recommender systems.","PeriodicalId":309823,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agree to disagree: on labelling helpful app reviews\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Simmons, Leonard Hoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3010915.3010976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mobile apps designers seek to prioritise and refine app features so as to optimise user experience across the ensemble of possible situations and contexts in which the app is used. App reviews---some helpful, others irrelevant---can be analysed for feedback on this user experience. However, few studies have specifically examined the helpfulness of app reviews. In this paper, we surveyed users and developers to rate 167 reviews for helpfulness, obtaining a total of 2,558 helpfulness ratings captured on a 5 point Likert scale. We found only slight agreement (nominal Krippendorff's alpha = 0.039) between participants on the helpfulness of reviews. Differences between reviews become evident when we summarise all the helpfulness ratings per review. We conclude that the disagreement among users limits the potential of mobile app review recommender systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

手机应用设计师寻求优先考虑和完善应用功能,以便在应用使用的各种可能情况和背景下优化用户体验。应用评论(游戏邦注:有些是有用的,有些是无关的)可以作为用户体验的反馈进行分析。然而,很少有研究专门考察应用评论的有用性。在本文中,我们调查了用户和开发人员,对167条评论的有用性进行了评级,获得了5分李克特量表上的总共2558个有用性评级。我们发现参与者在评论的帮助性上只有轻微的一致(名义上的Krippendorff的alpha = 0.039)。当我们总结每个评论的有用性评级时,评论之间的差异就变得明显了。我们得出结论,用户之间的分歧限制了手机应用评论推荐系统的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agree to disagree: on labelling helpful app reviews
Mobile apps designers seek to prioritise and refine app features so as to optimise user experience across the ensemble of possible situations and contexts in which the app is used. App reviews---some helpful, others irrelevant---can be analysed for feedback on this user experience. However, few studies have specifically examined the helpfulness of app reviews. In this paper, we surveyed users and developers to rate 167 reviews for helpfulness, obtaining a total of 2,558 helpfulness ratings captured on a 5 point Likert scale. We found only slight agreement (nominal Krippendorff's alpha = 0.039) between participants on the helpfulness of reviews. Differences between reviews become evident when we summarise all the helpfulness ratings per review. We conclude that the disagreement among users limits the potential of mobile app review recommender systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信