诊断措施评估备忘录。

{"title":"诊断措施评估备忘录。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contrast to therapeutic methods no general guidelines have as yet been formulated for the investigation of diagnostic measures. Previous studies have often delivered results that have not been interpretable. This situation was obviously unsatisfactory since staff, apparatus and financial resources were not being meaningfully employed. For these reasons the present memorandum was drawn up by a working group of the GMDS. It is intended to provide a framework for the evaluation of diagnostic measures. The process for the evaluation of diagnostic tests has by analogy to the procedure for the registration of drugs been divided into four clearly defined phases: Phase 1: preliminary technical and methodological investigations; Phase 2: estimation of test parameters in selected patients; Phase 3: Controlled diagnostic study; Phase 4: Investigation of the effectiveness; continuing risk-benefit analysis. Studies on new diagnostic tests should be designed according to the guidelines formulated in this memorandum. Many already established tests will require examination according to the criteria described here.</p>","PeriodicalId":15649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","volume":"28 12","pages":"873-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memorandum for the evaluation of diagnostic measures.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In contrast to therapeutic methods no general guidelines have as yet been formulated for the investigation of diagnostic measures. Previous studies have often delivered results that have not been interpretable. This situation was obviously unsatisfactory since staff, apparatus and financial resources were not being meaningfully employed. For these reasons the present memorandum was drawn up by a working group of the GMDS. It is intended to provide a framework for the evaluation of diagnostic measures. The process for the evaluation of diagnostic tests has by analogy to the procedure for the registration of drugs been divided into four clearly defined phases: Phase 1: preliminary technical and methodological investigations; Phase 2: estimation of test parameters in selected patients; Phase 3: Controlled diagnostic study; Phase 4: Investigation of the effectiveness; continuing risk-benefit analysis. Studies on new diagnostic tests should be designed according to the guidelines formulated in this memorandum. Many already established tests will require examination according to the criteria described here.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie\",\"volume\":\"28 12\",\"pages\":\"873-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与治疗方法相反,尚未制定诊断措施调查的一般指南。以前的研究经常得出无法解释的结果。这种情况显然不能令人满意,因为工作人员、设备和财政资源没有得到有意义的利用。由于这些原因,本备忘录是由全球导航系统的一个工作组起草的。它的目的是为诊断措施的评价提供一个框架。与药品注册程序类似,诊断试验的评估过程被明确划分为四个阶段:第一阶段:初步技术和方法调查;第二阶段:对选定患者的试验参数进行估计;第3期:对照诊断研究;第四阶段:有效性调查;持续的风险-收益分析。新诊断试验的研究应根据本备忘录中制定的指导方针进行设计。许多已经建立的测试将需要根据这里描述的标准进行检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Memorandum for the evaluation of diagnostic measures.

In contrast to therapeutic methods no general guidelines have as yet been formulated for the investigation of diagnostic measures. Previous studies have often delivered results that have not been interpretable. This situation was obviously unsatisfactory since staff, apparatus and financial resources were not being meaningfully employed. For these reasons the present memorandum was drawn up by a working group of the GMDS. It is intended to provide a framework for the evaluation of diagnostic measures. The process for the evaluation of diagnostic tests has by analogy to the procedure for the registration of drugs been divided into four clearly defined phases: Phase 1: preliminary technical and methodological investigations; Phase 2: estimation of test parameters in selected patients; Phase 3: Controlled diagnostic study; Phase 4: Investigation of the effectiveness; continuing risk-benefit analysis. Studies on new diagnostic tests should be designed according to the guidelines formulated in this memorandum. Many already established tests will require examination according to the criteria described here.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信