{"title":"它可能是工程设计,但它是设计吗?","authors":"R. Bannerot","doi":"10.18260/1-2-620-38468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Houston Abstract Creative design is not taught in most engineering academic programs. The engineering design textbooks (and presumably engineering design classes) do a good job presenting analytical schemes for the systematic evaluation of design and linear design processes --both of which are necessary and appropriate for much of engineering design -- but they really have little to say about the creative, parallel processing necessary for design. It is suggested that engineering students and design faculty would benefit greatly from a good dose of creative design as practiced by our colleagues in the Arts. The paper will provide evidence of how two aspects of “creativity” are missing from most engineering","PeriodicalId":355306,"journal":{"name":"2003 GSW Proceedings","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It May Be Engineering Design, but Is It Design?\",\"authors\":\"R. Bannerot\",\"doi\":\"10.18260/1-2-620-38468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Houston Abstract Creative design is not taught in most engineering academic programs. The engineering design textbooks (and presumably engineering design classes) do a good job presenting analytical schemes for the systematic evaluation of design and linear design processes --both of which are necessary and appropriate for much of engineering design -- but they really have little to say about the creative, parallel processing necessary for design. It is suggested that engineering students and design faculty would benefit greatly from a good dose of creative design as practiced by our colleagues in the Arts. The paper will provide evidence of how two aspects of “creativity” are missing from most engineering\",\"PeriodicalId\":355306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2003 GSW Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2003 GSW Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 GSW Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Houston Abstract Creative design is not taught in most engineering academic programs. The engineering design textbooks (and presumably engineering design classes) do a good job presenting analytical schemes for the systematic evaluation of design and linear design processes --both of which are necessary and appropriate for much of engineering design -- but they really have little to say about the creative, parallel processing necessary for design. It is suggested that engineering students and design faculty would benefit greatly from a good dose of creative design as practiced by our colleagues in the Arts. The paper will provide evidence of how two aspects of “creativity” are missing from most engineering