{"title":"将主控制频率响应与未来运行可靠性联系起来","authors":"H. Illian","doi":"10.1109/PES.2007.385568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author presents a guide for determining the significance of primary governing frequency response (PGFR) to total interconnection reliability using examples from the North American interconnections. Primary governing frequency response assessments based on measurement methods, failure modes, risk contributors, total risk estimation, and sensitivities are presented. Methods to assure adequate primary governing frequency response are examined with respect to responsibility allocation, local measurement and standard implementation.","PeriodicalId":380613,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relating Primary Governing Frequency Response to Future Operating Reliability\",\"authors\":\"H. Illian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PES.2007.385568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author presents a guide for determining the significance of primary governing frequency response (PGFR) to total interconnection reliability using examples from the North American interconnections. Primary governing frequency response assessments based on measurement methods, failure modes, risk contributors, total risk estimation, and sensitivities are presented. Methods to assure adequate primary governing frequency response are examined with respect to responsibility allocation, local measurement and standard implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2007.385568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2007.385568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relating Primary Governing Frequency Response to Future Operating Reliability
The author presents a guide for determining the significance of primary governing frequency response (PGFR) to total interconnection reliability using examples from the North American interconnections. Primary governing frequency response assessments based on measurement methods, failure modes, risk contributors, total risk estimation, and sensitivities are presented. Methods to assure adequate primary governing frequency response are examined with respect to responsibility allocation, local measurement and standard implementation.