Miquel Martínez, D. Andrés, J. Ruiz, Jesus Friginal
{"title":"可靠性基准测试结果分析:我们能做得更好吗?","authors":"Miquel Martínez, D. Andrés, J. Ruiz, Jesus Friginal","doi":"10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dependability benchmarking has become through the years more and more important in the process of systems evaluation. The increasing need for making systems more dependable in presence of perturbations has contributed to this fact. Nevertheless, even though many studies have focused on different areas related to dependability benchmarking, and some others have focused on the need of providing these benchmarks with good quality measures, there is still a gap in the process of the analysis of results. This paper focuses on providing a first glance at different approaches that may help filling this gap by making explicit the criteria followed in the decision making process.","PeriodicalId":218660,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of results in dependability benchmarking: Can we do better?\",\"authors\":\"Miquel Martínez, D. Andrés, J. Ruiz, Jesus Friginal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dependability benchmarking has become through the years more and more important in the process of systems evaluation. The increasing need for making systems more dependable in presence of perturbations has contributed to this fact. Nevertheless, even though many studies have focused on different areas related to dependability benchmarking, and some others have focused on the need of providing these benchmarks with good quality measures, there is still a gap in the process of the analysis of results. This paper focuses on providing a first glance at different approaches that may help filling this gap by making explicit the criteria followed in the decision making process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)\",\"volume\":\"249 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of results in dependability benchmarking: Can we do better?
Dependability benchmarking has become through the years more and more important in the process of systems evaluation. The increasing need for making systems more dependable in presence of perturbations has contributed to this fact. Nevertheless, even though many studies have focused on different areas related to dependability benchmarking, and some others have focused on the need of providing these benchmarks with good quality measures, there is still a gap in the process of the analysis of results. This paper focuses on providing a first glance at different approaches that may help filling this gap by making explicit the criteria followed in the decision making process.