软件内部集成-来自行业的量化经验

R. Land, Peter Thilenius, S. Larsson, I. Crnkovic
{"title":"软件内部集成-来自行业的量化经验","authors":"R. Land, Peter Thilenius, S. Larsson, I. Crnkovic","doi":"10.1109/EUROMICRO.2006.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When an organization faces new types of collaboration, for example after a company merger, there is a need to consolidate the existing in-house developed software. There are many high-level strategic decisions to be made, which should be based on as good foundation as possible, while these decisions must be made rapidly. Also, one must employ feasible processes and practices in order to get the two previously separate organizations to work towards a common goal. In order to study this topic, we previously performed an explorative and qualitative multiple case study, where we identified a number of suggested practices as well as other concerns to take into account. This paper presents a follow-up study, which aims at validating and quantifying these previous findings. This study includes a questionnaire distributed to in-house integration projects, aiming at validation of earlier findings. We compare the data to our previous conclusions, present observations on retirement of the existing systems and on the technical similarities of the existing systems. We also present some practices considered important but often neglected","PeriodicalId":213772,"journal":{"name":"32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO'06)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software In-House Integration - Quantified Experiences from Industry\",\"authors\":\"R. Land, Peter Thilenius, S. Larsson, I. Crnkovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EUROMICRO.2006.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When an organization faces new types of collaboration, for example after a company merger, there is a need to consolidate the existing in-house developed software. There are many high-level strategic decisions to be made, which should be based on as good foundation as possible, while these decisions must be made rapidly. Also, one must employ feasible processes and practices in order to get the two previously separate organizations to work towards a common goal. In order to study this topic, we previously performed an explorative and qualitative multiple case study, where we identified a number of suggested practices as well as other concerns to take into account. This paper presents a follow-up study, which aims at validating and quantifying these previous findings. This study includes a questionnaire distributed to in-house integration projects, aiming at validation of earlier findings. We compare the data to our previous conclusions, present observations on retirement of the existing systems and on the technical similarities of the existing systems. We also present some practices considered important but often neglected\",\"PeriodicalId\":213772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO'06)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROMICRO.2006.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROMICRO.2006.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

当一个组织面临新的协作类型时,例如在公司合并之后,就需要整合现有的内部开发的软件。有许多高层战略决策需要做出,这些决策应该建立在尽可能好的基础上,而这些决策必须迅速做出。此外,必须采用可行的过程和实践,以便使两个先前独立的组织朝着共同的目标工作。为了研究这个主题,我们之前执行了一个探索性和定性的多案例研究,在那里我们确定了一些建议的实践以及其他需要考虑的问题。本文提出了一项后续研究,旨在验证和量化这些先前的发现。本研究包括一份分发给内部集成项目的问卷,旨在验证早期的发现。我们将这些数据与我们以前的结论进行比较,目前对现有系统的退役和现有系统的技术相似性的观察。我们还介绍了一些被认为重要但经常被忽视的做法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software In-House Integration - Quantified Experiences from Industry
When an organization faces new types of collaboration, for example after a company merger, there is a need to consolidate the existing in-house developed software. There are many high-level strategic decisions to be made, which should be based on as good foundation as possible, while these decisions must be made rapidly. Also, one must employ feasible processes and practices in order to get the two previously separate organizations to work towards a common goal. In order to study this topic, we previously performed an explorative and qualitative multiple case study, where we identified a number of suggested practices as well as other concerns to take into account. This paper presents a follow-up study, which aims at validating and quantifying these previous findings. This study includes a questionnaire distributed to in-house integration projects, aiming at validation of earlier findings. We compare the data to our previous conclusions, present observations on retirement of the existing systems and on the technical similarities of the existing systems. We also present some practices considered important but often neglected
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信