Tuba Yıldırım
{"title":"Leone Caetani’nin Üsâme b. Zeyd’in Belkâ Seferi Hakkındaki Görüşlerine Dair Tahlil, Tenkit ve Değerlendirme","authors":"Tuba Yıldırım","doi":"10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the views and claims of the Italian politician and orientalist Leone Caetani in his work Annali Dell'Islām, which deals with the Prophet's preparation of an army to be sent to the Syrian region before his death and his appointment of Usāma b. Zayd as the commander of the military, which took place in the 11th year of the Hijrah in Islamic history. Due to its importance, every Muslim wants to learn the Islamic sciences from their basic sources accurately, especially the life of the Prophet Muhammad. For this purpose, Muslim scholars researched this field and produced many works. Western scholars also conducted research in this field for different purposes and eventually produced works within the scope of Orientalism. Leone Caetani (d. 1935) was one of the orientalists who aimed to study the religion, culture, thought, economic, and social life of the East. He wrote his work Annali Dell'Islām in ten volumes. The translation of the work from Italian by Hüseyin Cahit Yalçın between 1924 and 1927 caused a great outrage in our country. Due to the fact that historians live in different geographies and are nourished by the culture in which they live, they have often failed to do so, even though they want to approach events objectively. Therefore, it is important to approach orientalist writers' works carefully and evaluate their content. In addition, when differences in beliefs are added to the aforementioned factors, the picture that emerges can be far from scientific. As a matter of fact, this situation is also observed in Leone Caetani. Caetani's work contains many subjective, negative thoughts and incomplete and erroneous information. Although it is the product of many years and labor, it is seen that the work moves away from objectivity and scientificity at some points. Babanzâde Ahmet Naim, and Yusuf Ziya Yörükân wrote articles against his subjective and negative views which do not reflect the truth, and Âsım Köksal wrote a refutation to the first volume. However, when we searched the literature, we realized that previous studies did not include this subject, and the need for research arose. In this study, the information given by Caetani under the title \"Preparations for Usāma's departure to Balqa\" is subjected to analysis, criticism and evaluation. The aforementioned subject is discussed within orientalist Leone Caetani's views and claims. For this purpose, the main sources such as al-Wāqidī's al-Mag̲hāzī, Ibn Hishām's al-Sīra al-nabawiyya, al-Ṭabarī's Tarikh al-Umam wa al-Muluk, and many others such as the works of Ibn Saʿd, al-Yaʿqūbī, al-Masʿūdī, Yāqūt al-Ḥamawī, al-hahabī, Ibn Kathīr, etc., and the al-Kutub al-sitta in the field of hadīth have been examined to obtain information on the subject. In the light of the information obtained, Caetani's views and claims were objectively evaluated. As a result of our evaluations, we have found both accurate information and erroneous points. For example, while quoting information from al-Masʿūdī, he expressed Usāma's campaigns in the 10th and 11th years of Hijrī as if they took place in the same time without specifying the difference in years. This and similar errors have been explained with the information we have obtained from the main sources.","PeriodicalId":286866,"journal":{"name":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了意大利政治家和东方学家Leone Caetani在他的著作《Annali Dell'Islām》中的观点和主张,该书论述了先知在死前准备向叙利亚地区派遣一支军队,并任命Usāma b. Zayd为军队指挥官,这发生在伊斯兰历史上的希吉拉(Hijrah)第11年。由于它的重要性,每个穆斯林都希望准确地从基本来源学习伊斯兰科学,特别是先知穆罕默德的生活。为此,穆斯林学者对这一领域进行了研究,并出版了许多著作。西方学者也在这一领域进行了不同目的的研究,并最终在东方主义的范围内产生了作品。莱昂内·卡塔尼(生于1935年)是致力于研究东方宗教、文化、思想、经济和社会生活的东方学家之一。他的作品《Annali Dell》'Islām共十卷。1924年至1927年间,赫塞因·卡希特Yalçın从意大利语翻译的这部作品在我国引起了极大的愤怒。由于历史学家生活在不同的地理位置,并受到他们所处文化的滋养,他们经常无法做到这一点,即使他们想客观地对待事件。因此,认真看待东方学作家的作品并对其内容进行评价是十分重要的。此外,当信仰的差异加上上述因素时,出现的画面可能远非科学。事实上,塞拉利昂也出现了这种情况。Caetani的作品包含了许多主观的、消极的想法和不完整的、错误的信息。虽然它是多年劳动的产物,但从某些方面来看,它偏离了客观性和科学性。babanz de Ahmet Naim和Yusuf Ziya Yörükân写了文章反对他的主观和消极的观点,这些观点并不反映事实,Âsım Köksal写了一篇反驳第一卷的文章。然而,当我们搜索文献时,我们意识到以前的研究并没有包括这个主题,这就产生了研究的必要性。在本研究中,对Caetani在题为“Usāma前往巴尔卡的准备工作”下提供的资料进行了分析、批评和评价。上述主题在东方学家Leone Caetani的观点和主张中进行了讨论。为此目的,研究了主要的资料来源,如al-Wāqidī的al- magi hāzī、伊本Hishām的al-s ā ra al-nabawiyya、al-Ṭabarī的Tarikh al- umam wa al- muluk,以及许多其他资料,如伊本·萨伊德、al- ya ā qūbī、al- mas ā ūdī、Yāqūt al-Ḥamawī、al-hahab ā、伊本·kathurr等的著作,以及关于had领域的al- kutub al-sitta,以获得有关这一主题的信息。根据所获得的资料,对Caetani的观点和主张进行了客观评价。经过我们的评估,我们发现了准确的信息和错误的地方。例如,他在引用al-Mas ā ūdī的信息时,把Usāma在hijrji ā 10年和11年的战役说得好像是在同一时间发生的,而没有说明年份的差异。这种错误和类似的错误已经用我们从主要来源获得的信息加以解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leone Caetani’nin Üsâme b. Zeyd’in Belkâ Seferi Hakkındaki Görüşlerine Dair Tahlil, Tenkit ve Değerlendirme
This paper deals with the views and claims of the Italian politician and orientalist Leone Caetani in his work Annali Dell'Islām, which deals with the Prophet's preparation of an army to be sent to the Syrian region before his death and his appointment of Usāma b. Zayd as the commander of the military, which took place in the 11th year of the Hijrah in Islamic history. Due to its importance, every Muslim wants to learn the Islamic sciences from their basic sources accurately, especially the life of the Prophet Muhammad. For this purpose, Muslim scholars researched this field and produced many works. Western scholars also conducted research in this field for different purposes and eventually produced works within the scope of Orientalism. Leone Caetani (d. 1935) was one of the orientalists who aimed to study the religion, culture, thought, economic, and social life of the East. He wrote his work Annali Dell'Islām in ten volumes. The translation of the work from Italian by Hüseyin Cahit Yalçın between 1924 and 1927 caused a great outrage in our country. Due to the fact that historians live in different geographies and are nourished by the culture in which they live, they have often failed to do so, even though they want to approach events objectively. Therefore, it is important to approach orientalist writers' works carefully and evaluate their content. In addition, when differences in beliefs are added to the aforementioned factors, the picture that emerges can be far from scientific. As a matter of fact, this situation is also observed in Leone Caetani. Caetani's work contains many subjective, negative thoughts and incomplete and erroneous information. Although it is the product of many years and labor, it is seen that the work moves away from objectivity and scientificity at some points. Babanzâde Ahmet Naim, and Yusuf Ziya Yörükân wrote articles against his subjective and negative views which do not reflect the truth, and Âsım Köksal wrote a refutation to the first volume. However, when we searched the literature, we realized that previous studies did not include this subject, and the need for research arose. In this study, the information given by Caetani under the title "Preparations for Usāma's departure to Balqa" is subjected to analysis, criticism and evaluation. The aforementioned subject is discussed within orientalist Leone Caetani's views and claims. For this purpose, the main sources such as al-Wāqidī's al-Mag̲hāzī, Ibn Hishām's al-Sīra al-nabawiyya, al-Ṭabarī's Tarikh al-Umam wa al-Muluk, and many others such as the works of Ibn Saʿd, al-Yaʿqūbī, al-Masʿūdī, Yāqūt al-Ḥamawī, al-hahabī, Ibn Kathīr, etc., and the al-Kutub al-sitta in the field of hadīth have been examined to obtain information on the subject. In the light of the information obtained, Caetani's views and claims were objectively evaluated. As a result of our evaluations, we have found both accurate information and erroneous points. For example, while quoting information from al-Masʿūdī, he expressed Usāma's campaigns in the 10th and 11th years of Hijrī as if they took place in the same time without specifying the difference in years. This and similar errors have been explained with the information we have obtained from the main sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信