国家控制印尼自然资源的权利:宪法法院判决

Rifandy Ritonga, Isharyanto Isharyanto, R. Rudy, Aulia Oktarizka Vivi Pusita Sari A.P
{"title":"国家控制印尼自然资源的权利:宪法法院判决","authors":"Rifandy Ritonga, Isharyanto Isharyanto, R. Rudy, Aulia Oktarizka Vivi Pusita Sari A.P","doi":"10.24042/as-siyasi.v1i2.11343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to look at the interpretation and impact of the decisions of the Constitutional Court relating to the review of laws relating to the State's Right to Control in the management of natural resources. This research is a normative legal research using secondary data which includes primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach used is a statutory approach. The results of the study found that on the one hand it is a guideline for understanding and interpreting Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution which has been amended. On the other hand, from several Judicial Review made by the Constitutional Court, there are legal uncertainties, one of which is the Oil and Gas Law and the Electricity Law. In addition, the lack of uniformity in understanding natural resources in every decision of the Constitutional Court also causes differences in understanding in interpreting Natural Resources to be included in the law.","PeriodicalId":252033,"journal":{"name":"As-Siyasi : Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hak Negara untuk Mengontrol Sumber Daya Alam di Indonesia: Review Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi\",\"authors\":\"Rifandy Ritonga, Isharyanto Isharyanto, R. Rudy, Aulia Oktarizka Vivi Pusita Sari A.P\",\"doi\":\"10.24042/as-siyasi.v1i2.11343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to look at the interpretation and impact of the decisions of the Constitutional Court relating to the review of laws relating to the State's Right to Control in the management of natural resources. This research is a normative legal research using secondary data which includes primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach used is a statutory approach. The results of the study found that on the one hand it is a guideline for understanding and interpreting Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution which has been amended. On the other hand, from several Judicial Review made by the Constitutional Court, there are legal uncertainties, one of which is the Oil and Gas Law and the Electricity Law. In addition, the lack of uniformity in understanding natural resources in every decision of the Constitutional Court also causes differences in understanding in interpreting Natural Resources to be included in the law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"As-Siyasi : Journal of Constitutional Law\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"As-Siyasi : Journal of Constitutional Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v1i2.11343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"As-Siyasi : Journal of Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v1i2.11343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究宪法法院关于审查有关国家在管理自然资源方面的控制权的法律的决定的解释和影响。本研究是一项使用二级数据的规范性法律研究,包括一级、二级和三级法律资料。所采用的方法是法定方法。研究结果发现,一方面,它是理解和解释1945年修改后的宪法第33条的指南。另一方面,从宪法法院的几次司法审查来看,存在法律上的不确定性,其中之一是《石油天然气法》和《电力法》。此外,宪法裁判所在每次判决中对“自然资源”的理解不统一,也导致了对“自然资源”纳入法律的解释存在分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hak Negara untuk Mengontrol Sumber Daya Alam di Indonesia: Review Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
This study aims to look at the interpretation and impact of the decisions of the Constitutional Court relating to the review of laws relating to the State's Right to Control in the management of natural resources. This research is a normative legal research using secondary data which includes primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach used is a statutory approach. The results of the study found that on the one hand it is a guideline for understanding and interpreting Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution which has been amended. On the other hand, from several Judicial Review made by the Constitutional Court, there are legal uncertainties, one of which is the Oil and Gas Law and the Electricity Law. In addition, the lack of uniformity in understanding natural resources in every decision of the Constitutional Court also causes differences in understanding in interpreting Natural Resources to be included in the law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信