{"title":"面对混乱的数据,衡量成本规避","authors":"J. Romeu, J. Ciccimaro, J. Trinkle","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents alternative methods to forecast or predict failure trends when the data violates the assumptions associated with least squares linear regression. Simulations based on actual case studies validated that least squares linear regression may provide a biased model in the presence of messy data. Non-parametric regression methods provide robust forecasting models less sensitive to non-constant variability, outliers, and small data sets.","PeriodicalId":270494,"journal":{"name":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring cost avoidance in the face of messy data\",\"authors\":\"J. Romeu, J. Ciccimaro, J. Trinkle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents alternative methods to forecast or predict failure trends when the data violates the assumptions associated with least squares linear regression. Simulations based on actual case studies validated that least squares linear regression may provide a biased model in the presence of messy data. Non-parametric regression methods provide robust forecasting models less sensitive to non-constant variability, outliers, and small data sets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring cost avoidance in the face of messy data
This paper presents alternative methods to forecast or predict failure trends when the data violates the assumptions associated with least squares linear regression. Simulations based on actual case studies validated that least squares linear regression may provide a biased model in the presence of messy data. Non-parametric regression methods provide robust forecasting models less sensitive to non-constant variability, outliers, and small data sets.