延时电磁数据集的高级处理及一种新的分段非接触式第一障厚度测量方法

Faisal Alnakeeb, Siddharth Jain, Christna Golaco, Vasilii Skutin, A. Elkadi, Ilnur Bikbulatov
{"title":"延时电磁数据集的高级处理及一种新的分段非接触式第一障厚度测量方法","authors":"Faisal Alnakeeb, Siddharth Jain, Christna Golaco, Vasilii Skutin, A. Elkadi, Ilnur Bikbulatov","doi":"10.2118/213981-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper will share the findings of time-lapse monitoring from two corrosion surveys conducted four years apart in the subject well; present a new processing methodology that improved metal thickness estimation and yielded better results when applied to data from two legacy wells; and describe a novel surveillance tool of unique design that was also deployed in the subject well. The positive and encouraging results achieved using this tool will also be discussed.\n Electromagnetic pulse surveys were conducted in 2016 and 2020 to evaluate independently the metal loss in three casing barriers. The 2016 analysis involved a simplistic data processing method. A more sophisticated processing technique was recently applied to both surveys (2016 and 2020). This new method estimates the thickness for each barrier through forward modelling based on the numerical solution of the Maxwell equations. A newly introduced electromagnetic tool was also run in combination. This is a unique approach because it provides a segmented electromagnetic metal thickness evaluation of the first barrier without the need for pad contacts with the casing wall.\n The simplistic processing from 2016 assumed, for each barrier, a baseline for the tool readings that corresponded to the nominal casing thickness. It then translated the deflections from this baseline into a metal loss or gain. These figures were output only when they exceeded the tool's accuracy. The advanced processing that was used in 2020, which is based on forward modelling, estimated less metal loss in general in comparison with the 2016 survey. These results agreed with the segmented tool estimations for the first barrier, which was run in combination in 2020. This confirms the methodology's robustness and accuracy. In addition, this new method outputs metal loss figures at every depth point regardless of the tool accuracy. The new processing was applied to previously acquired data sets in two additional wells in the same field, and the obtained results were very satisfactory.\n The new tool, which provides a segmented electromagnetic metal thickness evaluation, also delivered exciting results by providing accurate thickness estimations in eight circumferential sectors of the casing wall without pad contact. This constitutes a substantial improvement over the existing all-round and averaged measurement offered by conventional electromagnetic tools. These segmented results enabled the client to make a better-informed decision about the well and to postpone an expensive workover.\n This paper confirms the necessity of time-lapse surveys for monitoring the integrity of downhole tubulars. It also proves that numerical solution of the Maxwell equations through forward modelling of acquired electromagnetic data yields robust and more accurate thickness estimations than the previously used methods. Finally, it demonstrates the effectiveness of the new segmented and contactless electromagnetic tool for assessing the first casing barrier.","PeriodicalId":286390,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Processing of Time-Lapse Electromagnetic Data Sets and a Novel Segmented and Contactless Electromagnetic Thickness Measurement of the First Barrier\",\"authors\":\"Faisal Alnakeeb, Siddharth Jain, Christna Golaco, Vasilii Skutin, A. Elkadi, Ilnur Bikbulatov\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/213981-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper will share the findings of time-lapse monitoring from two corrosion surveys conducted four years apart in the subject well; present a new processing methodology that improved metal thickness estimation and yielded better results when applied to data from two legacy wells; and describe a novel surveillance tool of unique design that was also deployed in the subject well. The positive and encouraging results achieved using this tool will also be discussed.\\n Electromagnetic pulse surveys were conducted in 2016 and 2020 to evaluate independently the metal loss in three casing barriers. The 2016 analysis involved a simplistic data processing method. A more sophisticated processing technique was recently applied to both surveys (2016 and 2020). This new method estimates the thickness for each barrier through forward modelling based on the numerical solution of the Maxwell equations. A newly introduced electromagnetic tool was also run in combination. This is a unique approach because it provides a segmented electromagnetic metal thickness evaluation of the first barrier without the need for pad contacts with the casing wall.\\n The simplistic processing from 2016 assumed, for each barrier, a baseline for the tool readings that corresponded to the nominal casing thickness. It then translated the deflections from this baseline into a metal loss or gain. These figures were output only when they exceeded the tool's accuracy. The advanced processing that was used in 2020, which is based on forward modelling, estimated less metal loss in general in comparison with the 2016 survey. These results agreed with the segmented tool estimations for the first barrier, which was run in combination in 2020. This confirms the methodology's robustness and accuracy. In addition, this new method outputs metal loss figures at every depth point regardless of the tool accuracy. The new processing was applied to previously acquired data sets in two additional wells in the same field, and the obtained results were very satisfactory.\\n The new tool, which provides a segmented electromagnetic metal thickness evaluation, also delivered exciting results by providing accurate thickness estimations in eight circumferential sectors of the casing wall without pad contact. This constitutes a substantial improvement over the existing all-round and averaged measurement offered by conventional electromagnetic tools. These segmented results enabled the client to make a better-informed decision about the well and to postpone an expensive workover.\\n This paper confirms the necessity of time-lapse surveys for monitoring the integrity of downhole tubulars. It also proves that numerical solution of the Maxwell equations through forward modelling of acquired electromagnetic data yields robust and more accurate thickness estimations than the previously used methods. Finally, it demonstrates the effectiveness of the new segmented and contactless electromagnetic tool for assessing the first casing barrier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/213981-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213981-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将分享在该井中相隔四年进行的两次腐蚀调查的延时监测结果;提出了一种新的处理方法,改进了金属厚度的估计,并在应用于两口老井的数据时获得了更好的结果;并描述了一种设计独特的新型监控工具,该工具也在本课题中得到了很好的应用。还将讨论利用这一工具取得的积极和令人鼓舞的成果。2016年和2020年进行了电磁脉冲测量,分别评估了三个套管屏障的金属损失量。2016年的分析采用了一种简单的数据处理方法。最近,一种更复杂的处理技术应用于两次调查(2016年和2020年)。该方法基于麦克斯韦方程组的数值解,通过正演模拟来估计每个障壁的厚度。新引入的电磁工具也组合下入。这是一种独特的方法,因为它提供了分段的电磁金属厚度评估,而不需要垫块与套管壁接触。2016年的简单处理假设,对于每个屏障,工具读数的基线与标称套管厚度相对应。然后,它将该基线的偏转转换为金属损失或收益。这些数字只有在超出工具的精度时才输出。与2016年的调查相比,2020年使用的基于正演模型的先进处理估计总体上减少了金属损失。这些结果与2020年首次联合使用的分段工具估计值一致。这证实了该方法的稳健性和准确性。此外,无论工具精度如何,这种新方法都会输出每个深度点的金属损失量。将新的处理方法应用于同一油田的另外两口井中先前获得的数据集,获得了非常令人满意的结果。该新工具提供分段电磁金属厚度评估,在没有垫块接触的情况下,在套管壁的8个周向扇区提供准确的厚度估算,也取得了令人兴奋的结果。这比现有的常规电磁工具提供的全方位和平均测量有了实质性的改进。这些分段结果使客户能够对井做出更明智的决定,并推迟昂贵的修井作业。本文证实了利用延时测量技术监测井下管柱完整性的必要性。通过对电磁数据进行正演模拟得到的麦克斯韦方程组的数值解比以前使用的方法更可靠、更精确。最后,验证了新型分段式非接触式电磁工具用于评估第一套管屏障的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced Processing of Time-Lapse Electromagnetic Data Sets and a Novel Segmented and Contactless Electromagnetic Thickness Measurement of the First Barrier
This paper will share the findings of time-lapse monitoring from two corrosion surveys conducted four years apart in the subject well; present a new processing methodology that improved metal thickness estimation and yielded better results when applied to data from two legacy wells; and describe a novel surveillance tool of unique design that was also deployed in the subject well. The positive and encouraging results achieved using this tool will also be discussed. Electromagnetic pulse surveys were conducted in 2016 and 2020 to evaluate independently the metal loss in three casing barriers. The 2016 analysis involved a simplistic data processing method. A more sophisticated processing technique was recently applied to both surveys (2016 and 2020). This new method estimates the thickness for each barrier through forward modelling based on the numerical solution of the Maxwell equations. A newly introduced electromagnetic tool was also run in combination. This is a unique approach because it provides a segmented electromagnetic metal thickness evaluation of the first barrier without the need for pad contacts with the casing wall. The simplistic processing from 2016 assumed, for each barrier, a baseline for the tool readings that corresponded to the nominal casing thickness. It then translated the deflections from this baseline into a metal loss or gain. These figures were output only when they exceeded the tool's accuracy. The advanced processing that was used in 2020, which is based on forward modelling, estimated less metal loss in general in comparison with the 2016 survey. These results agreed with the segmented tool estimations for the first barrier, which was run in combination in 2020. This confirms the methodology's robustness and accuracy. In addition, this new method outputs metal loss figures at every depth point regardless of the tool accuracy. The new processing was applied to previously acquired data sets in two additional wells in the same field, and the obtained results were very satisfactory. The new tool, which provides a segmented electromagnetic metal thickness evaluation, also delivered exciting results by providing accurate thickness estimations in eight circumferential sectors of the casing wall without pad contact. This constitutes a substantial improvement over the existing all-round and averaged measurement offered by conventional electromagnetic tools. These segmented results enabled the client to make a better-informed decision about the well and to postpone an expensive workover. This paper confirms the necessity of time-lapse surveys for monitoring the integrity of downhole tubulars. It also proves that numerical solution of the Maxwell equations through forward modelling of acquired electromagnetic data yields robust and more accurate thickness estimations than the previously used methods. Finally, it demonstrates the effectiveness of the new segmented and contactless electromagnetic tool for assessing the first casing barrier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信