上游和下游

L. M. Johnson
{"title":"上游和下游","authors":"L. M. Johnson","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190943646.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is the leading factor in deaths after brain injuries: 64 to 92 percent of neurointensive care deaths occur after treatment withdrawal, most within the first 72 hours after injury. There is risk inversion in the way the upstream and downstream ethical risks are weighed for comatose patients. The inversion occurs when more certain risks are undertaken upstream (in neurointensive care) to avoid less certain, more speculative risks downstream. These are ethical risks—the upstream risk is that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment soon after a brain injury will result in death, and a lost opportunity to survive and live a good and flourishing life. The downstream risk is that the patient will survive, but in a condition that is unacceptable to them. The upstream/downstream problem is a wicked problem, where each solution can create new problems. Whether the risks can, and should, be reinverted is the question.","PeriodicalId":167181,"journal":{"name":"The Ethics of Uncertainty","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upstream/Downstream\",\"authors\":\"L. M. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780190943646.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is the leading factor in deaths after brain injuries: 64 to 92 percent of neurointensive care deaths occur after treatment withdrawal, most within the first 72 hours after injury. There is risk inversion in the way the upstream and downstream ethical risks are weighed for comatose patients. The inversion occurs when more certain risks are undertaken upstream (in neurointensive care) to avoid less certain, more speculative risks downstream. These are ethical risks—the upstream risk is that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment soon after a brain injury will result in death, and a lost opportunity to survive and live a good and flourishing life. The downstream risk is that the patient will survive, but in a condition that is unacceptable to them. The upstream/downstream problem is a wicked problem, where each solution can create new problems. Whether the risks can, and should, be reinverted is the question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Ethics of Uncertainty\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Ethics of Uncertainty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190943646.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ethics of Uncertainty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190943646.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

停止维持生命的治疗是脑损伤后死亡的主要因素:64%至92%的神经重症监护死亡发生在停止治疗后,大多数发生在损伤后的头72小时内。对于昏迷患者,在权衡上游和下游伦理风险的方式上存在风险倒置。当上游(神经重症监护室)承担了更确定的风险,以避免下游不确定的、更投机的风险时,就会发生反转。这些都是伦理风险——上游风险是,在脑损伤后不久撤销维持生命的治疗将导致死亡,并失去生存和过上美好繁荣生活的机会。下游的风险是病人会活下来,但在一个他们无法接受的条件下。上游/下游问题是一个棘手的问题,每个解决方案都可能产生新的问题。风险是否能够(也应该)被逆转是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Upstream/Downstream
Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is the leading factor in deaths after brain injuries: 64 to 92 percent of neurointensive care deaths occur after treatment withdrawal, most within the first 72 hours after injury. There is risk inversion in the way the upstream and downstream ethical risks are weighed for comatose patients. The inversion occurs when more certain risks are undertaken upstream (in neurointensive care) to avoid less certain, more speculative risks downstream. These are ethical risks—the upstream risk is that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment soon after a brain injury will result in death, and a lost opportunity to survive and live a good and flourishing life. The downstream risk is that the patient will survive, but in a condition that is unacceptable to them. The upstream/downstream problem is a wicked problem, where each solution can create new problems. Whether the risks can, and should, be reinverted is the question.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信