{"title":"面向内部威胁研究的本体:内部威胁定义的多样性","authors":"David A. Mundie, Samuel J. Perl, Carly L. Huth","doi":"10.1109/STAST.2013.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of standardization of the terms insider and insider threat has been a noted problem for researchers in the insider threat field. This paper describes the investigation of 42 different definitions of the terms insider and insider threat, with the goal of better understanding the current conceptual model of insider threat and facilitating communication in the research community.","PeriodicalId":252423,"journal":{"name":"2013 Third Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward an Ontology for Insider Threat Research: Varieties of Insider Threat Definitions\",\"authors\":\"David A. Mundie, Samuel J. Perl, Carly L. Huth\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STAST.2013.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lack of standardization of the terms insider and insider threat has been a noted problem for researchers in the insider threat field. This paper describes the investigation of 42 different definitions of the terms insider and insider threat, with the goal of better understanding the current conceptual model of insider threat and facilitating communication in the research community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Third Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust\",\"volume\":\"231 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Third Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAST.2013.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Third Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAST.2013.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward an Ontology for Insider Threat Research: Varieties of Insider Threat Definitions
The lack of standardization of the terms insider and insider threat has been a noted problem for researchers in the insider threat field. This paper describes the investigation of 42 different definitions of the terms insider and insider threat, with the goal of better understanding the current conceptual model of insider threat and facilitating communication in the research community.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
