高中数学的合作学习经验

Lekë Pepkolaj, Siditë Duraj, V. Toma, Dritan Gerbeti
{"title":"高中数学的合作学习经验","authors":"Lekë Pepkolaj, Siditë Duraj, V. Toma, Dritan Gerbeti","doi":"10.1109/HORA49412.2020.9152852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the main results obtained from analyzes of face-to-face experiences in high school mathematics. These experiences are realized by two models of cooperative learning: the collaborative model and the peer tutoring. Both models differ in the required roles, in the task types given to students and in the teacher's role change. From the analysis viewpoint of the peer collaboration model the positive aspects are seen such as: disciplinary skills, decision making skills, strengthening of knowledge, social interaction, meanwhile the negative aspects are: group assessment, unintentional waste of time. The peer tutoring model was more effective when it happened without given roles. Both models highlighted effective results through dialogue between students and arguments of a metacognitive rather than cognitive nature. The presented analysis may be important in identifying the effectiveness of working with groups under these two models and the possibility of implementing them in an online learning format.","PeriodicalId":166917,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA)","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A collaborative learning experience in high school mathematics\",\"authors\":\"Lekë Pepkolaj, Siditë Duraj, V. Toma, Dritan Gerbeti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HORA49412.2020.9152852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes the main results obtained from analyzes of face-to-face experiences in high school mathematics. These experiences are realized by two models of cooperative learning: the collaborative model and the peer tutoring. Both models differ in the required roles, in the task types given to students and in the teacher's role change. From the analysis viewpoint of the peer collaboration model the positive aspects are seen such as: disciplinary skills, decision making skills, strengthening of knowledge, social interaction, meanwhile the negative aspects are: group assessment, unintentional waste of time. The peer tutoring model was more effective when it happened without given roles. Both models highlighted effective results through dialogue between students and arguments of a metacognitive rather than cognitive nature. The presented analysis may be important in identifying the effectiveness of working with groups under these two models and the possibility of implementing them in an online learning format.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA)\",\"volume\":\"179 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA49412.2020.9152852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA49412.2020.9152852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了通过对高中数学面对面教学经验的分析得出的主要结果。这些经验是通过两种合作学习模式来实现的:协作模式和同伴辅导模式。这两种模式的不同之处在于所要求的角色、赋予学生的任务类型和教师角色的变化。从同伴协作模型的分析角度来看,积极的方面是:学科技能,决策技能,加强知识,社会互动,而消极的方面是:小组评估,无意浪费时间。同伴辅导模式在没有特定角色的情况下更有效。这两种模式都强调通过学生之间的对话和元认知而非认知性质的争论来取得有效的结果。所提出的分析对于确定在这两种模式下与小组合作的有效性以及在在线学习格式中实施它们的可能性可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A collaborative learning experience in high school mathematics
This article describes the main results obtained from analyzes of face-to-face experiences in high school mathematics. These experiences are realized by two models of cooperative learning: the collaborative model and the peer tutoring. Both models differ in the required roles, in the task types given to students and in the teacher's role change. From the analysis viewpoint of the peer collaboration model the positive aspects are seen such as: disciplinary skills, decision making skills, strengthening of knowledge, social interaction, meanwhile the negative aspects are: group assessment, unintentional waste of time. The peer tutoring model was more effective when it happened without given roles. Both models highlighted effective results through dialogue between students and arguments of a metacognitive rather than cognitive nature. The presented analysis may be important in identifying the effectiveness of working with groups under these two models and the possibility of implementing them in an online learning format.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信