通信网络中用于争用解决的Q-Ary分割算法的吞吐量

C. Blondia, B. V. Houdt
{"title":"通信网络中用于争用解决的Q-Ary分割算法的吞吐量","authors":"C. Blondia, B. V. Houdt","doi":"10.4310/CIS.2004.V4.N2.A2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The throughput characteristics of contention-based random access channels which use Q-ary splitting algorithms (where Q is the number of groups into which colliding users are split) are analyzed. The algorithms considered are of the Capetanakis-Tsybakov-Mikhailov-Vvedenskaya (CTMV) type and are studied for infinite populations of identical users generating packets according to a discrete time batch Markovian arrival process (D-BMAP). D-BMAPs are a class of tractable Markovian arrival processes, which, in general, are non-renewal. Free channel-access is assumed in combination with Q-ary collision resolution algorithms that exploit either binary or ternary feedback. For the resulting schemes, tree structured Quasi-Birth-Death (QBD) Markov chains are constructed and their stability is determined. The maximum achievable throughput is determined for a variety of arrival processes and splitting factors Q. It is concluded that binary (Q = 2) and ternary (Q = 3) algorithms should be preferred above other splitting factors Q as the throughput for Q > 3 quickly degrades when subject to bursty arrival streams. If packets arrivals are correlated and bursty, higher throughput rates can be achieved by making use of biased coins.","PeriodicalId":185710,"journal":{"name":"Commun. Inf. Syst.","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Throughput of Q-Ary Splitting Algorithms for Contention Resolution in Communication Networks\",\"authors\":\"C. Blondia, B. V. Houdt\",\"doi\":\"10.4310/CIS.2004.V4.N2.A2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The throughput characteristics of contention-based random access channels which use Q-ary splitting algorithms (where Q is the number of groups into which colliding users are split) are analyzed. The algorithms considered are of the Capetanakis-Tsybakov-Mikhailov-Vvedenskaya (CTMV) type and are studied for infinite populations of identical users generating packets according to a discrete time batch Markovian arrival process (D-BMAP). D-BMAPs are a class of tractable Markovian arrival processes, which, in general, are non-renewal. Free channel-access is assumed in combination with Q-ary collision resolution algorithms that exploit either binary or ternary feedback. For the resulting schemes, tree structured Quasi-Birth-Death (QBD) Markov chains are constructed and their stability is determined. The maximum achievable throughput is determined for a variety of arrival processes and splitting factors Q. It is concluded that binary (Q = 2) and ternary (Q = 3) algorithms should be preferred above other splitting factors Q as the throughput for Q > 3 quickly degrades when subject to bursty arrival streams. If packets arrivals are correlated and bursty, higher throughput rates can be achieved by making use of biased coins.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Commun. Inf. Syst.\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Commun. Inf. Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4310/CIS.2004.V4.N2.A2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commun. Inf. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4310/CIS.2004.V4.N2.A2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

分析了采用Q-ary分割算法的基于争用的随机接入信道的吞吐量特性(其中Q为将发生冲突的用户分割成的组数)。所考虑的算法是Capetanakis-Tsybakov-Mikhailov-Vvedenskaya (CTMV)类型,并研究了根据离散时间批处理马尔可夫到达过程(D-BMAP)生成数据包的相同用户的无限种群。d - bmap是一类可处理的马尔可夫到达过程,通常是不可更新的。假设自由通道访问与利用二进制或三元反馈的Q-ary碰撞解决算法相结合。对于所得到的方案,构造了树结构拟生-死(QBD)马尔可夫链,并确定了其稳定性。确定了各种到达过程和分裂因子Q的最大可实现吞吐量。结论是,由于Q > 3的吞吐量在受到突发到达流时迅速下降,因此二进制(Q = 2)和三进制(Q = 3)算法应优先于其他分裂因子Q。如果数据包到达是相关的和突发的,则可以通过使用有偏差的硬币来实现更高的吞吐率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Throughput of Q-Ary Splitting Algorithms for Contention Resolution in Communication Networks
The throughput characteristics of contention-based random access channels which use Q-ary splitting algorithms (where Q is the number of groups into which colliding users are split) are analyzed. The algorithms considered are of the Capetanakis-Tsybakov-Mikhailov-Vvedenskaya (CTMV) type and are studied for infinite populations of identical users generating packets according to a discrete time batch Markovian arrival process (D-BMAP). D-BMAPs are a class of tractable Markovian arrival processes, which, in general, are non-renewal. Free channel-access is assumed in combination with Q-ary collision resolution algorithms that exploit either binary or ternary feedback. For the resulting schemes, tree structured Quasi-Birth-Death (QBD) Markov chains are constructed and their stability is determined. The maximum achievable throughput is determined for a variety of arrival processes and splitting factors Q. It is concluded that binary (Q = 2) and ternary (Q = 3) algorithms should be preferred above other splitting factors Q as the throughput for Q > 3 quickly degrades when subject to bursty arrival streams. If packets arrivals are correlated and bursty, higher throughput rates can be achieved by making use of biased coins.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信