投票的进化模型

Juan D. Montoro-Pons, Miguel A. Puchades-Navarro
{"title":"投票的进化模型","authors":"Juan D. Montoro-Pons, Miguel A. Puchades-Navarro","doi":"10.1051/EJESS:2001103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collective allocation of resources that takes place in po- litical markets is characterized by the complex exchange that emerges among the individuals involved. Traditional Public Choice models de- part from individual rational choice in a setup in which many of its strict requirements need not hold. This paper introduces a model of social interaction among agents in a simple political market which de- parts from bounded rationality and evolutionary dynamics as the key mechanisms that drive individual behavior. Learning plays a signicant role as it allows to establish an individual link between decisions and collective outcomes. The model is that of a representative democracy with two parties in which individuals are restricted to a one dimensional policy space. The main ndings from computational experiments allow us to revise the results of traditional models, specially those related to the voting paradox. We nd that turnout levels may be higher than ex- pected in a population composed of fully rational agents, and that there is a rationale for abstention that stresses the role of limited informa- tion, the discounting of the future, and the extent of the redistributive policies. Classication Codes. D72.","PeriodicalId":352454,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evolutionary model of voting\",\"authors\":\"Juan D. Montoro-Pons, Miguel A. Puchades-Navarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/EJESS:2001103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collective allocation of resources that takes place in po- litical markets is characterized by the complex exchange that emerges among the individuals involved. Traditional Public Choice models de- part from individual rational choice in a setup in which many of its strict requirements need not hold. This paper introduces a model of social interaction among agents in a simple political market which de- parts from bounded rationality and evolutionary dynamics as the key mechanisms that drive individual behavior. Learning plays a signicant role as it allows to establish an individual link between decisions and collective outcomes. The model is that of a representative democracy with two parties in which individuals are restricted to a one dimensional policy space. The main ndings from computational experiments allow us to revise the results of traditional models, specially those related to the voting paradox. We nd that turnout levels may be higher than ex- pected in a population composed of fully rational agents, and that there is a rationale for abstention that stresses the role of limited informa- tion, the discounting of the future, and the extent of the redistributive policies. Classication Codes. D72.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/EJESS:2001103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/EJESS:2001103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在政治市场中发生的资源集体配置,其特点是涉及到的个人之间出现了复杂的交换。传统的公共选择模型在其许多严格要求不成立的情况下,部分偏离了个人理性选择。本文提出了一个简单政治市场中主体之间的社会互动模型,该模型抛弃了有限理性和进化动力学作为驱动个体行为的关键机制。学习起着重要的作用,因为它允许在决策和集体结果之间建立个人联系。这种模式是由两党组成的代议制民主,其中个人被限制在一维的政策空间中。计算实验的主要结论使我们能够修正传统模型的结果,特别是那些与投票悖论有关的模型。我们发现,在一个由完全理性行为者组成的人口中,投票率可能比预期的要高,而且有一种弃权的理由,强调有限信息的作用、对未来的贴现和再分配政策的程度。论述代码。D72。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evolutionary model of voting
Collective allocation of resources that takes place in po- litical markets is characterized by the complex exchange that emerges among the individuals involved. Traditional Public Choice models de- part from individual rational choice in a setup in which many of its strict requirements need not hold. This paper introduces a model of social interaction among agents in a simple political market which de- parts from bounded rationality and evolutionary dynamics as the key mechanisms that drive individual behavior. Learning plays a signicant role as it allows to establish an individual link between decisions and collective outcomes. The model is that of a representative democracy with two parties in which individuals are restricted to a one dimensional policy space. The main ndings from computational experiments allow us to revise the results of traditional models, specially those related to the voting paradox. We nd that turnout levels may be higher than ex- pected in a population composed of fully rational agents, and that there is a rationale for abstention that stresses the role of limited informa- tion, the discounting of the future, and the extent of the redistributive policies. Classication Codes. D72.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信